Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-7102

Gitlab 16.4.0 – 17.5.0

Published
13 February 2025
Modified
06 August 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 9.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0043 35th percentile
Risk Priority 66 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-7102 is a critical-severity Execution with Unnecessary Privileges (CWE-250) vulnerability in Gitlab Gitlab. Its CVSS base score is 9.6 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-7102 is a vulnerability discovered in GitLab Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE), affecting all versions starting from 16.4 prior to 17.5.0. The issue enables an attacker to trigger a CI/CD pipeline as another user under certain circumstances. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.6 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N) and is linked to CWE-250 (Execution with Unnecessary Privileges), with additional NVD-CWE-noinfo classification. The vulnerability was published on 2025-02-13.

The attack requires low privileges (PR:L), such as those of an authenticated user, and can be carried out over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction (UI:N). Exploitation changes scope (S:C), allowing the attacker to trigger pipelines in the context of another user, which can result in high confidentiality (C:H) and integrity (I:H) impacts, though availability is unaffected (A:N).

Advisories recommend upgrading to GitLab 17.5.0 or later to mitigate the issue, as it resolves the vulnerability in the specified version range. Additional details are available in the GitLab issue tracker at https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/474414 and the HackerOne disclosure report at https://hackerone.com/reports/2623063.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue was discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 16.4 prior to 17.5.0 which allows an attacker to trigger a pipeline as another user under certain circumstances.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1055 Process Injection Stealth
Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-5207Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2024-8266Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2024-8114Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-0805Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2024-1539Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-2246Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-5612Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-5600Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2023-2233Same product: Gitlab Gitlab
CVE-2025-14103Same product: Gitlab Gitlab

Affected Assets

gitlab
gitlab
16.4.0 — 17.5.0 · 16.4.0 — 17.5.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 6 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V10.2.3
  • V13.2.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Least privilege directly requires that only the minimum necessary authorizations are granted, structurally eliminating execution with unnecessary privileges.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

PR.AA-05 directly enforces least privilege so largely eliminates CWE-250 at design time, yet the weakness can still arise from runtime escalation paths, third-party code, or misapplied role definitions outside this single control.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Requiring explicit justification and time-limited grants discourages the routine allocation of unnecessary privileges that would otherwise allow execution with more rights than required.

prevents

Restricting privileged utilities to the fewest trusted users and requiring explicit authorization directly stops developers or operators from embedding or invoking code that runs with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

Mandating separate non-privileged identities for routine work and restricting privileged accounts to administrative tasks reduces the chance that everyday operations run with unnecessary elevated rights.

prevents

The control explicitly calls for minimizing privileged identities and disabling unnecessary accounts, thereby reducing the number of processes that run with unnecessary privileges.

prevents

The requirement to restrict privileged access and apply segregation of duties limits the number of processes or accounts that must run with elevated rights, lowering the impact of unnecessary privilege assignments.

mitigates

Forcing distinct roles for initiating versus executing changes reduces the chance that an individual will run with unnecessary privileges to perform both steps.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Windows 10 (1 rule)
  • V-220712 Only accounts responsible for the administration of a system must have Administrator rights on the system. prevents CWE-250
Windows 11 (1 rule)
  • V-253269 Only accounts responsible for the administration of a system must have Administrator rights on the system. prevents CWE-250
Windows Server 2016 (1 rule)
  • V-225007 Only administrators responsible for the member server or standalone or nondomain-joined system must have Administrator rights on the system. prevents CWE-250
Windows Server 2019 (1 rule)
  • V-205746 Windows Server 2019 must only allow Administrators responsible for the member server or standalone or nondomain-joined system to have Administrator rights on the system. prevents CWE-250
Windows Server 2022 (1 rule)
  • V-254428 Windows Server 2022 must only allow administrators responsible for the member server or standalone or nondomain-joined system to have Administrator rights on the system. prevents CWE-250

References