Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-0577

Published
18 February 2026
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 4.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0024 16th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-0577 is a medium-severity Insufficient Entropy (CWE-331) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 4.8 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 16th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-13 (Cryptographic Protection) and SC-12 (Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An insufficient entropy vulnerability was found in glibc. The getrandom and arc4random family of functions may return predictable randomness if these functions are called again after the fork, which happens concurrently with a call to any of these functions.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-34236Shared CWE-331
CVE-2023-46648Shared CWE-331
CVE-2023-31582Shared CWE-331
CVE-2024-38270Shared CWE-331
CVE-2024-25730Shared CWE-331
CVE-2025-15387Shared CWE-331
CVE-2025-14261Shared CWE-331
CVE-2026-7210Shared CWE-331
CVE-2023-34973Shared CWE-331
CVE-2026-11403Shared CWE-331

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SC-13 Cryptographic Protection
  • SC-12 Cryptographic Key Establishment and Management
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V6.5.2
  • V11.3.4

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires implementation and use of approved cryptographic protection mechanisms, which must include cryptographically strong RNG sources that remain unpredictable after fork.

prevent

Mandates proper cryptographic key establishment that depends on high-quality entropy sources, preventing reliance on the defective post-fork getrandom/arc4random behavior.

prevent

Requires timely remediation of software flaws, directly addressing the glibc insufficient-entropy defect through patching or replacement of affected library versions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices explicitly include vetted RNG and entropy sources, directly preventing this weakness while covering many other development concerns.

PR.AA-03 partial match
prevents

Password-strength policies implicitly require sufficient entropy, but the control addresses authentication rather than algorithmic randomness.

PR.DS-01 partial match
prevents

Proper encryption for data-at-rest requires sufficient entropy for keys/nonces; eliminating the weakness therefore supports but does not fully realize the control.

PR.DS-02 partial match
prevents

Cryptographic protection of data-in-transit depends on adequate entropy; the weakness directly undermines the control's effectiveness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Mandates use of cryptography that must rely on sufficient entropy sources.

detects

Security testing can detect insufficient-entropy defects before release.

prevents

Secure-SDLC activities include entropy validation during design and testing.

prevents

Secure-coding rules can explicitly forbid weak random-number generation.

degrades

Requires secure authentication mechanisms that depend on unpredictable secrets.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that reduce the attack surface for weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Derived transitively via CVE→CWE→STIG over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248524 OL 8 must implement NIST FIPS-validated cryptography for the following: To provision digital signatures, to generate cryptographic hashes, and to protect data requiring data-at-rest protections in accordance with applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, policies, regulations, and standards. via CWE-331
RHEL 8 (1 rule)
  • V-230223 RHEL 8 must implement NIST FIPS-validated cryptography for the following: To provision digital signatures, to generate cryptographic hashes, and to protect data requiring data-at-rest protections in accordance with applicable federal laws, Executive Orders, directives, policies, regulations, and standards. via CWE-331

References