CVE-2025-10205
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-10205 is a high-severity Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt (CWE-759) vulnerability in Abb (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Password Cracking (T1110.002); ranked at the 10th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to IA-5 (Authenticator Management) and SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-29725
Vulnerability Data
Use of a One-Way Hash with a Predictable Salt vulnerability in ABB FLXEON.This issue affects FLXEON: through 9.3.5. and newer versions
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Cryptographic protection requirements specify approved algorithms and usage that encompass salted one-way hashes for passwords.
Authenticator management requires secure credential storage practices that include salted hashes.
Developer testing and evaluation can identify missing salt values through code review or analysis.
Development standards and tools can mandate salted hashing as part of secure implementation requirements.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Use of cryptography requires appropriate cryptographic controls including salting for password hashing.
Security testing can detect unsalted hashes but does not prevent their introduction.
Secure SDLC processes can include password-handling rules but do not guarantee salted hashes.
Application security requirements can mandate salted hashing but do not prescribe the technical detail.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsalted password hashes and require salting.
Secure authentication mandates salted, one-way hashes for credentials, directly preventing unsalted hashing.