Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2025-10702 is a high-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Progress DataDirect Connect (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 22th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-198215
Vulnerability Data
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Progress DataDirect Connect for JDBC drivers, Progress DataDirect Open Access JDBC driver and Hybrid Data Pipeline allows Remote Code Inclusion. The SpyAttribute connection option implemented by the DataDirect Connect for…
more
JDBC drivers, DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC driver and the DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC driver supports an undocumented syntax construct for the option value that if discovered can be used by an attacker. If an application allows an end user to specify a value for the SpyAttributes connection option then an attacker can use the undocumented syntax to cause the driver to load an arbitrary class on the class path and execute a constructor on that class. This issue affects: DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Amazon Redshift: through 6.0.0.001392, fixed in 6.0.0.001541 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Cassandra: through 6.0.0.000805, fixed in 6.0.0.000833 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Hive: through 6.0.1.001499, fixed in 6.0.1.001628 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache Impala: through 6.0.0.001155, fixed in 6.0.0.001279 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Apache SparkSQL: through 6.0.1.001222, fixed in 6.0.1.001344 DataDirect Connect for JDBC Autonomous REST Connector: through 6.0.1.006961, fixed in 6.0.1.007063 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for DB2: through 6.0.0.000717, fixed in 6.0.0.000964 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google Analytics 4: through 6.0.0.000454, fixed in 6.0.0.000525 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Google BigQuery: through 6.0.0.002279, fixed in 6.0.0.002410 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Greenplum: through 6.0.0.001712, fixed in 6.0.0.001727 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Informix: through 6.0.0.000690, fixed in 6.0.0.0851 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Dynamics 365: through 6.0.0.003161, fixed in 6.0.0.3198 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft SQLServer: through 6.0.0.001936, fixed in 6.0.0.001957 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Microsoft Sharepoint: through 6.0.0.001559, fixed in 6.0.0.001587 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MongoDB: through 6.1.0.001654, fixed in 6.1.0.001669 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for MySQL: through 5.1.4.000330, fixed in 5.1.4.000364 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Database: through 6.0.0.001747, fixed in 6.0.0.001776 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Eloqua: through 6.0.0.001438, fixed in 6.0.0.001458 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Sales Cloud: through 6.0.0.001225, fixed in 6.0.0.001316 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Oracle Service Cloud: through 5.1.4.000298, fixed in 5.1.4.000309 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for PostgreSQL: through 6.0.0.001843, fixed in 6.0.0.001856 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Progress OpenEdge: through 5.1.4.000187, fixed in 5.1.4.000189 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Salesforce: through 6.0.0.003020, fixed in 6.0.0.003125 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP HANA: through 6.0.0.000879, product retired DataDirect Connect for JDBC for SAP S/4 HANA: through 6.0.1.001818, fixed in 6.0.1.001858 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Sybase ASE: through 5.1.4.000161, fixed in 5.1.4.000162 DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Snowflake: through 6.0.1.001821, fixed in 6.0.1.001856 DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Server: through 4.6.2.3309, fixed in 4.6.2.3430 DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline JDBC Driver: through 4.6.2.0607, fixed in 4.6.2.1023 DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline On Premises Connector: through 4.6.2.1223, fixed in 4.6.2.1339 DataDirect Hybrid Data Pipeline Docker: through 4.6.2.3316, fixed in 4.6.2.3430 DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 8.1.0.0177, fixed in 8.1.0.0183 DataDirect OpenAccess JDBC Driver: through 9.0.0.0019, fixed in 9.0.0.0022
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.
Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.
Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).
PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.