Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-13995

Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager 7.5.0

Published
19 March 2026
Modified
23 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0018 8th percentile
Risk Priority 37 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-13995 is a medium-severity Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input (CWE-1286) vulnerability in Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager. Its CVSS base score is 5.0 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 could allow an attacker with access to one tenant to access hostname data from another tenant's account.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-33121Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2020-4280Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2025-33117Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2024-47107Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-26273Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2025-15051Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-40367Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2026-1276Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2023-26274Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager
CVE-2025-33097Same product: Ibm Qradar Security Information And Event Manager

Affected Assets

ibm
qradar security information and event manager
7.5.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.1.1
  • V1.4.2
  • V2.1.1
  • V2.2.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SI-10 requires validation of information inputs for correctness, directly stopping syntactic validation failures from being introduced or exploitable.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require syntactic input validation to prevent malformed data handling.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches missing or incorrect syntax validation.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation to ensure syntactic correctness.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for validation of input syntax.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the likelihood of missing syntactic checks.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require proper syntactic validation of all inputs.

References