Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-14687

Ibm Db2 Intelligence Center 1.1.0 – 1.1.3

Published
26 December 2025
Modified
14 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0018 8th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-14687 is a medium-severity Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security (CWE-602) vulnerability in Ibm Db2 Intelligence Center. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-24 (Access Control Decisions) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Db2 Intelligence Center 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.1.2 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions due to client-side enforcement of sever side security mechanisms.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-43188Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36410Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36093Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2024-41751Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2024-41750Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-1838Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36039Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36102Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36327Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2024-49824Same vendor: Ibm

Affected Assets

ibm
db2 intelligence center
1.1.0 — 1.1.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-24 Access Control Decisions
  • AC-6 Least Privilege
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V10.7.1
  • V2.2.2
  • V8.3.1
  • V10.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires the system (not the client) to enforce authorized actions before allowing access to Db2 Intelligence Center functions.

prevent

Mandates that access-control decisions are made by the authoritative server component rather than by client-side logic that can be bypassed.

prevent

Limits the privileges an authenticated user can exercise, reducing the impact of any client-side bypass of server-side checks.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent design flaws that place server security enforcement on the client.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Proper policy-based enforcement of authorizations implies server-side controls rather than client-only checks.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage client-side trust but do not directly address this weakness.

detects

Security testing can detect client-side enforcement but is not the primary mitigation.

prevents

Information access restriction is undermined when the client is trusted to enforce it.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates server-side validation and prevents reliance on client enforcement.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for server-side enforcement of security mechanisms.

prevents

Secure coding standards require server-side checks and reject client-only enforcement.

References