Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-14811

Ibm Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.3 – 6.2.3.6

Published
13 March 2026
Modified
02 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0021 11th percentile
Risk Priority 15 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-14811 is a low-severity Use of HTTP Request With Sensitive Query String (CWE-598) vulnerability in Ibm Sterling Partner Engagement Manager. Its CVSS base score is 3.1 (Low).

Operationally, ranked at the 11th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-8 (Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Sterling Partner Engagement Manager 6.2.3.0 through 6.2.3.5 and 6.2.4.0 through 6.2.4.2 could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information from the query string of an HTTP GET method to process a request which could be obtained using man in…

more

the middle techniques.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-43045Same product: Ibm Sterling Partner Engagement Manager
CVE-2025-33093Same product: Ibm Sterling Partner Engagement Manager
CVE-2023-38722Same product: Ibm Sterling Partner Engagement Manager
CVE-2023-32335Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2024-41738Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2023-50954Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-36371Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2026-15322Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2023-50328Same vendor: Ibm
CVE-2025-13726Same product: Ibm Sterling Partner Engagement Manager

Affected Assets

ibm
sterling partner engagement manager
6.2.3 — 6.2.3.6 · 6.2.3 — 6.2.3.6 · 6.2.4 — 6.2.4.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
  • AC-4 Information Flow Enforcement
  • SC-7 Boundary Protection
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.4.5
  • V14.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Requires cryptographic protection of HTTP traffic so sensitive query-string data cannot be read via MITM.

prevent

Enforces information-flow rules that prohibit placing sensitive parameters in URLs transmitted over untrusted networks.

prevent

Boundary-protection mechanisms can enforce TLS inspection or blocking of plaintext HTTP containing sensitive query data.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent embedding sensitive data in query strings as part of input-handling and data-flow design.

PR.DS-02 partial match
prevents

HTTPS encryption protects query strings in transit but does not address the root design flaw of placing sensitive data in URLs.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect sensitive data leakage via query strings.

mitigates

DLP solutions can detect and block sensitive data in URLs.

degrades

Network security controls can enforce HTTPS and block sensitive data in URLs.

prevents

Application security requirements should mandate avoiding sensitive data in query strings.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage exposing sensitive data in URLs.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prohibit placing secrets in query parameters.

References