CVE-2025-21959
Linux Kernel 4.14.92 – 4.15
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:LCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2025-21959 is a high-severity Use of Uninitialized Resource (CWE-908) vulnerability in Linux Linux Kernel. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique OS Credential Dumping (T1003); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-9361
Vulnerability Data
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_conncount: Fully initialize struct nf_conncount_tuple in insert_tree() Since commit b36e4523d4d5 ("netfilter: nf_conncount: fix garbage collection confirm race"), `cpu` and `jiffies32` were introduced to the struct nf_conncount_tuple. The commit made…
more
nf_conncount_add() initialize `conn->cpu` and `conn->jiffies32` when allocating the struct. In contrast, count_tree() was not changed to initialize them. By commit 34848d5c896e ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Split insert and traversal"), count_tree() was split and the relevant allocation code now resides in insert_tree(). Initialize `conn->cpu` and `conn->jiffies32` in insert_tree(). BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in find_or_evict net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:117 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in __nf_conncount_add+0xd9c/0x2850 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:143 find_or_evict net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:117 [inline] __nf_conncount_add+0xd9c/0x2850 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:143 count_tree net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:438 [inline] nf_conncount_count+0x82f/0x1e80 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:521 connlimit_mt+0x7f6/0xbd0 net/netfilter/xt_connlimit.c:72 __nft_match_eval net/netfilter/nft_compat.c:403 [inline] nft_match_eval+0x1a5/0x300 net/netfilter/nft_compat.c:433 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x426/0x2290 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x1a5/0x230 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:23 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook_slow_list+0x24d/0x860 net/netfilter/core.c:663 NF_HOOK_LIST include/linux/netfilter.h:350 [inline] ip_sublist_rcv+0x17b7/0x17f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:633 ip_list_rcv+0x9ef/0xa40 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:669 __netif_receive_skb_list_ptype net/core/dev.c:5936 [inline] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x15c5/0x1670 net/core/dev.c:5983 __netif_receive_skb_list net/core/dev.c:6035 [inline] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x1085/0x1700 net/core/dev.c:6126 netif_receive_skb_list+0x5a/0x460 net/core/dev.c:6178 xdp_recv_frames net/bpf/test_run.c:280 [inline] xdp_test_run_batch net/bpf/test_run.c:361 [inline] bpf_test_run_xdp_live+0x2e86/0x3480 net/bpf/test_run.c:390 bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xf1d/0x1ae0 net/bpf/test_run.c:1316 bpf_prog_test_run+0x5e5/0xa30 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4407 __sys_bpf+0x6aa/0xd90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5813 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5902 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5900 [inline] __ia32_sys_bpf+0xa0/0xe0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5900 ia32_sys_call+0x394d/0x4180 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_32.h:358 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:165 [inline] __do_fast_syscall_32+0xb0/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:387 do_fast_syscall_32+0x38/0x80 arch/x86/entry/common.c:412 do_SYSENTER_32+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/common.c:450 entry_SYSENTER_compat_after_hwframe+0x84/0x8e Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4121 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4164 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x915/0xe10 mm/slub.c:4171 insert_tree net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:372 [inline] count_tree net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:450 [inline] nf_conncount_count+0x1415/0x1e80 net/netfilter/nf_conncount.c:521 connlimit_mt+0x7f6/0xbd0 net/netfilter/xt_connlimit.c:72 __nft_match_eval net/netfilter/nft_compat.c:403 [inline] nft_match_eval+0x1a5/0x300 net/netfilter/nft_compat.c:433 expr_call_ops_eval net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:240 [inline] nft_do_chain+0x426/0x2290 net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c:288 nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x1a5/0x230 net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c:23 nf_hook_entry_hookfn include/linux/netfilter.h:154 [inline] nf_hook_slow+0xf4/0x400 net/netfilter/core.c:626 nf_hook_slow_list+0x24d/0x860 net/netfilter/core.c:663 NF_HOOK_LIST include/linux/netfilter.h:350 [inline] ip_sublist_rcv+0x17b7/0x17f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:633 ip_list_rcv+0x9ef/0xa40 net/ip ---truncated---
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including static analysis) can find uses of uninitialized resources after they are coded.
Requiring documented development standards and tools can mandate initialization checks and safe patterns that stop the weakness from being introduced.
Engineering principles can require explicit resource initialization before use, structurally avoiding uninitialized access.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC activities such as static analysis and code review directly prevent use of uninitialized resources while also addressing many other weaknesses.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect uninitialized resource usage through dynamic analysis and fuzzing.
Secure development life cycle mandates initialization checks and static analysis that can catch uninitialized resource use.
Application security requirements can specify mandatory initialization of variables and resources before use.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles include defensive coding practices that prevent use of uninitialized memory or objects.
Secure coding standards directly require explicit initialization of all variables and resources, substantially mitigating CWE-908.