Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-23395

Published
26 May 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v4 7.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0020 10th percentile
Risk Priority 29 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-23395 is a high-severity Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors (CWE-271) vulnerability in Suse (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Setuid and Setgid (T1548.001); ranked at the 10th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-6 (Least Privilege) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Screen 5.0.0 when it runs with setuid-root privileges does not drop privileges while operating on a user supplied path. This allows unprivileged users to create files in arbitrary locations with `root` ownership, the invoking user's (real) group ownership and file…

more

mode 0644. All data written to the Screen PTY will be logged into this file, allowing to escalate to root privileges

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1548.001 Setuid and Setgid Privilege Escalation
An adversary may abuse configurations where an application has the setuid or setgid bits set in order to get code running in a different (and possibly more privileged) user’s context.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1134 Access Token Manipulation Stealth
Adversaries may modify access tokens to operate under a different user or system security context to perform actions and bypass access controls.
T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may circumvent mechanisms designed to control privilege elevation to gain higher-level permissions.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-35179Shared CWE-271
CVE-2023-22648Shared CWE-271
CVE-2025-53819Shared CWE-271
CVE-2024-0985Shared CWE-271
CVE-2026-35535Shared CWE-271
CVE-2023-38496Shared CWE-271
CVE-2026-44477Shared CWE-271

Affected Assets

Suse
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Least privilege explicitly mandates dropping privileges to the minimum necessary before transferring control.

Access enforcement directly requires that privileges are lowered before handing resources to less-privileged actors.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Explicit inclusion of least-privilege policy directly addresses failure to drop privileges before handing control to lower-privileged actors.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure-development practices encompass correct privilege-dropping logic, though the control is broader than this single weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Restricting use of privileged utility programs forces explicit privilege lowering before handing control to unprivileged actors.

degrades

Privileged access rights explicitly require least-privilege assignment and timely revocation, directly mitigating failure to drop privileges.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes privilege management reviews, providing indirect coverage of the weakness.

prevents

Secure coding standards can mandate privilege-dropping calls, yet the control is broader than this single weakness.

mitigates

Information access restriction policies can limit privilege scope but do not specifically address dropping privileges at runtime.

References