Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-25748

CSRF in Digitaldruid Hoteldruid 3.0.7

Published
11 March 2025
Modified
29 January 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0041 34th percentile
Risk Priority 54 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-25748 is a high-severity CSRF (CWE-352) vulnerability in Digitaldruid Hoteldruid. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-23 (Session Authenticity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-25748 is a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability, classified under CWE-352, affecting the gestione_utenti.php endpoint in HotelDruid version 3.0.7. Published on 2025-03-11, it stems from a lack of origin or referrer validation and the absence of CSRF tokens, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized actions—such as modifying user passwords—on behalf of authenticated users. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.3 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L). It is disputed, however, due to the presence of an id_sessione CSRF token in the software.

Exploitation requires local access and low privileges, meaning an attacker must target an already-authenticated user with low privileges. The low attack complexity and lack of required user interaction (beyond the victim's authentication state) allow attackers to craft malicious requests that the victim submits unwittingly, such as via a malicious webpage. Successful exploitation grants high confidentiality and integrity impacts—enabling actions like password changes—and a low availability impact.

Advisory details are available in the referenced post at https://www.huyvo.net/post/cve-2025-25748-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability-in-hoteldruid-3-0-7. No specific patch or mitigation guidance is provided in the CVE description.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A CSRF vulnerability in the gestione_utenti.php endpoint of HotelDruid 3.0.7 allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions (e.g., modifying user passwords) on behalf of authenticated users by exploiting the lack of origin or referrer validation and the absence of CSRF tokens.…

more

NOTE: this is disputed because there is an id_sessione CSRF token.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-8489Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-51638Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-23804Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-36667Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-26445Shared CWE-352
CVE-2024-22601Shared CWE-352
CVE-2023-50766Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-9635Shared CWE-352
CVE-2025-30541Shared CWE-352
CVE-2023-27520Shared CWE-352

Affected Assets

digitaldruid
hoteldruid
3.0.7

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.3.2
  • V3.5.1
  • V10.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement requires verifying that state-changing requests originate from the authenticated user rather than a forged cross-site source.

Protecting session authenticity prevents attackers from replaying or forging authenticated requests via the victim's browser.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require anti-CSRF controls such as tokens or SameSite attributes.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

mitigates

By denying access to phishing or malicious sites, the control lowers the likelihood that a user will be tricked into submitting a forged request that performs an unintended action on another site.

none

Contextual intelligence about emerging CSRF toolkits can be translated into updated anti-CSRF token or same-site policy configurations across applications.

References