CVE-2025-2707
Path Traversal in Iocoder Ruoyi-Vue-Pro 2.4.1
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-2707 is a medium-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Iocoder Ruoyi-Vue-Pro. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-2707 is a critical path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) affecting zhijiantianya ruoyi-vue-pro version 2.4.1. The issue resides in an unknown functionality of the Front-End Store Interface component, specifically the /app-api/infra/file/upload endpoint, where manipulation of the 'path' argument enables traversal outside intended directories. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L) and was published on 2025-03-24.
The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by low-privileged authenticated users (PR:L) with low attack complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation allows partial integrity and availability impacts, potentially enabling attackers to write or overwrite files in unauthorized locations via path traversal, though confidentiality is unaffected.
Advisories from VulDB and a GitHub security disclosure note that the exploit has been publicly released and may be actively used. The vendor was contacted early regarding the issue but provided no response, and no patches or mitigations are mentioned in the available references.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-8007
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in zhijiantianya ruoyi-vue-pro 2.4.1. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /app-api/infra/file/upload of the component Front-End Store Interface. The manipulation of the argument path leads to…
more
path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.3.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.
Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.
Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.
PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.
Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.
Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.
Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.