Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-30284

RCE in Adobe Coldfusion 2021 … 2025

Published
08 April 2025
Modified
21 April 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.019 77th percentile
Risk Priority 71 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-30284 is a high-severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) vulnerability in Adobe Coldfusion. Its CVSS base score is 8.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 23% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

ColdFusion versions 2023.12, 2021.18, 2025.0 and earlier contain a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability that permits arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. The flaw is tracked as CWE-502 and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.4 reflecting network attack vector, low attack complexity, high privileges required, required user interaction, and changed scope with high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

A high-privileged attacker can leverage the issue to bypass security protections and execute code, although successful exploitation depends on user interaction. The vulnerability therefore allows an authenticated administrator who convinces a victim to perform a specific action to obtain code execution outside the original security context.

Adobe’s security bulletin APSB25-15 at https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/coldfusion/apsb25-15.html addresses the issue and supplies remediation guidance. The associated EPSS score rose materially from a low baseline to a peak of 0.3001 on 2026-01-13 before receding to the current value of 0.0103, indicating that exploitation interest appeared after disclosure.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

ColdFusion versions 2023.12, 2021.18, 2025.0 and earlier are affected by a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A high-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security…

more

protections and execute code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction and scope is changed.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2017-3066Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-29300Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-44350Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-26359Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-44351Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-38204Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2025-61810Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2024-41874Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2023-38203Same product: Adobe Coldfusion
CVE-2018-4939Same product: Adobe Coldfusion

Affected Assets

adobe
coldfusion
2021, 2023, 2025

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can uncover deserialization flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops deserialization of untrusted data by ensuring inputs are valid before processing.

Engineering principles such as safe deserialization and input sanitization structurally prevent the weakness from being introduced.

Integrity verification tools can detect malformed or tampered serialized data after the fact.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 none match
prevents

PR.PS-02 addresses only post-deployment updates/patching and cannot prevent introduction of unsafe deserialization code, yet it can remediate some instances when the flaw exists in outdated libraries or components.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing includes validation of deserialization routines and the use of untrusted data, reducing the likelihood that unsafe object reconstruction will be deployed.

prevents

Requiring vetted libraries, regular updates and SAST before release reduces the likelihood that deserialization logic will accept and act on attacker-controlled serialized objects.

finds

Regular scanning of third-party libraries and timely patching reduce the likelihood that unsafe deserialization vulnerabilities remain active.

none

Mandatory malware scanning of data received over networks or storage media intercepts malicious serialized payloads before they are deserialized by the target application.

References