Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-33054

Microsoft Windows 11 22H2 ≤ 10.0.22621.5624

Published
08 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0083 54th percentile
Risk Priority 62 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-33054 is a high-severity Insufficient UI Warning of Dangerous Operations (CWE-357) vulnerability in Microsoft Windows 11 22H2. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique User Execution (T1204); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

The vulnerability CVE-2025-33054 stems from insufficient UI warnings of dangerous operations in the Remote Desktop Client. This flaw, tracked under CWE-357, enables spoofing and carries a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.1 reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, no required privileges, and required user interaction leading to high confidentiality and integrity impacts.

An unauthorized attacker can exploit the issue remotely over a network to conduct spoofing attacks against users of the Remote Desktop Client, potentially tricking them into approving unsafe operations without adequate visual cues.

Microsoft's Security Response Center advisory at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-33054 addresses the vulnerability and is the primary source for official mitigation guidance. The associated EPSS score remains flat at 0.0116 with no material increase observed since disclosure.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Insufficient UI warning of dangerous operations in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1204 User Execution Execution
An adversary may rely upon specific actions by a user in order to gain execution.
T1204.001 Malicious Link Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user clicking a malicious link in order to gain execution.
T1204.002 Malicious File Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user opening a malicious file in order to gain execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-26151Same product: Microsoft Windows 11 23H2
CVE-2025-47967Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-49054Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-43505Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-29057Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2026-58597Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-26188Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-21387Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-43580Same vendor: Microsoft
CVE-2024-21336Same vendor: Microsoft

Affected Assets

microsoft
windows 11 22h2
≤ 10.0.22621.5624
microsoft
windows 11 23h2
≤ 10.0.22631.5624
microsoft
windows 11 24h2
≤ 10.0.26100.4652
microsoft
windows server 2025
≤ 10.0.26100.4652

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly encompass designing noticeable UI warnings for risky operations.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance validates that dangerous-operation warnings are sufficiently prominent.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle requires usable security prompts and warnings to be designed into the UI.

prevents

Application security requirements include clear, effective user warnings for dangerous operations.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles address usable security mechanisms such as prominent warnings.

prevents

Secure coding practices include implementing noticeable, effective UI warnings for risky actions.

References