Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-36595

Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance 9.2.4.0 – 9.2.4.11

Published
27 June 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0055 43th percentile
Risk Priority 54 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-36595 is a high-severity Static Code Injection (CWE-96) vulnerability in Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Dell Unisphere for PowerMax vApp, version(s) 9.2.4.x, contain(s) an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Statically Saved Code ('Static Code Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1027.009 Embedded Payloads Stealth
Adversaries may embed payloads within other files to conceal malicious content from defenses.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-48671Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2024-25955Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2023-48664Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2023-48662Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2023-48661Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2023-48665Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2023-48663Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2024-25946Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2023-48660Same product: Dell Solutions Enabler Virtual Appliance
CVE-2025-36588Same product: Dell Unisphere For Powermax Virtual Appliance

Affected Assets

dell
solutions enabler virtual appliance
9.2.4.0 — 9.2.4.11
dell
unisphere for powermax virtual appliance
9.2.4.0 — 9.2.4.17

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing neutralization of directives in saved code artifacts.

Input validation directly stops unneutralized directives from being inserted into static code resources.

Engineering principles include secure input handling and neutralization requirements that structurally avoid static injection.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization to block static code injection into templates, configs, or libraries.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance will detect static code injection but does not prevent it at the source.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and sanitization that directly prevents static code injection.

prevents

Application security requirements include rules for neutralizing untrusted input before it is stored in executable resources.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce injection surfaces but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly requires proper neutralization of directives in templates, libraries and configuration files.

mitigates

Change management can catch unsafe code changes but does not enforce input neutralization.

References