Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-41359

Smallsrv Small Http Server 3.06.36 – 3.06.38

Published
26 March 2026
Modified
26 March 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0015 5th percentile
Risk Priority 31 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-41359 is a high-severity Unquoted Search Path or Element (CWE-428) vulnerability in Smallsrv Small Http Server. Its CVSS base score is 8.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 5th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-41359 is an unquoted service path vulnerability in Small HTTP Server version 3.06.36, specifically impacting the service executable located at 'C:\Program Files (x86)\shttps_mg\http.exe service'. This classic misconfiguration (CWE-428) occurs because the service path lacks proper quotation marks, allowing the Windows service control manager to prioritize executable searches in higher directories within the system path. The vulnerability was published on 2026-03-26 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H), indicating high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

A local attacker with low privileges can exploit this flaw by placing a malicious executable named 'http.exe' in a directory that takes precedence in the system's PATH environment variable, such as C:\Windows. When the service starts or restarts, it will execute the attacker's binary instead of the legitimate one, enabling arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the service account. Successful exploitation could grant unauthorized system access, privilege escalation, or denial-of-service through service disruption.

Mitigation guidance from advisories, including the INCIBE-CERT notice at https://www.incibe.es/en/incibe-cert/notices/aviso/multiple-vulnerabilities-small-http-server-smallsrv, recommends quoting the service path correctly in the Windows registry, applying available security patches to update the software, and limiting physical and network access to affected systems to reduce local attack opportunities.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Vulnerability related to an unquoted service path in Small HTTP Server 3.06.36, specifically affecting the executable located at 'C:\Program Files (x86)\shttps_mg\http.exe service'. This misconfiguration allows a local attacker to place a malicious executable with the same name in a higher…

more

priority directory, causing the service to execute the malicious file instead of the legitimate one. Exploiting this flaw could allow arbitrary code execution, unauthorized access to the system, or service disruption. To mitigate the risk, the service path must be properly quoted, and systems must be kept up to date with security patches, while restricting physical and network access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-41368Same product: Smallsrv Small Http Server
CVE-2025-66269Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-26911Shared CWE-428
CVE-2020-37061Shared CWE-428
CVE-2025-57227Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-36658Shared CWE-428
CVE-2016-20086Shared CWE-428
CVE-2016-20091Shared CWE-428
CVE-2023-2331Shared CWE-428
CVE-2026-1585Shared CWE-428

Affected Assets

smallsrv
small http server
3.06.36 — 3.06.38

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover unquoted search paths through static analysis or dynamic test cases.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate proper quoting and escaping of path elements.

Engineering principles can require safe construction and quoting of search paths and command elements.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent path-handling flaws such as unquoted elements during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect unquoted search-path issues before deployment.

degrades

Enforcing controlled software installation can prevent unquoted search-path elements in executables and scripts.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle practices include input validation and path handling that reduce unquoted search-path weaknesses.

degrades

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require safe path construction and quoting conventions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly mandate quoting search paths and avoiding unsafe path construction.

degrades

Change-management processes can enforce review of path-handling changes that might introduce unquoted elements.

References