Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-41697

Phoenixcontact Fl Switch 2708 Pn Firmware ≤ 3.50

Published
09 December 2025
Modified
19 December 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 6.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0023 14th percentile
Risk Priority 49 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-41697 is a medium-severity Missing Protection Mechanism for Alternate Hardware Interface (CWE-1299) vulnerability in Phoenixcontact Fl Switch 2303-8Sp1. Its CVSS base score is 6.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism (T1548); ranked at the 14th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SC-7 (Boundary Protection) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An attacker can use an undocumented UART port on the PCB as a side-channel to get root access e.g. with the credentials obtained from CVE-2025-41692.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may circumvent mechanisms designed to control privilege elevation to gain higher-level permissions.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-41747Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41751Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41696Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41693Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41695Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41746Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41748Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41750Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41694Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008
CVE-2025-41749Same product: Phoenixcontact Fl Nat 2008

Affected Assets

phoenixcontact
fl switch 2708 pn firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2708 firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2608 pn firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2608 firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2516 pn firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2516 firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2514-2sfp pn firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2514-2sfp firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2512-2gc-2sfp firmware
≤ 3.50
phoenixcontact
fl switch 2508 pn firmware
≤ 3.50
+59 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V13.3.3
  • V13.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

AC-3 requires access enforcement on every logical path to protected assets, directly stopping bypass via unguarded alternate hardware interfaces.

SC-7 mandates control at all external and key internal interfaces, preventing access-control bypass through alternate hardware paths.

CM-7 disables or restricts unnecessary ports and interfaces, eliminating many alternate hardware paths before they can be exploited.

SC-3 isolates security functions so that alternate interfaces cannot reach protected assets without passing through the reference monitor.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

DE.CM-09 partial match
degrades

CWE-1299 can impair DE.CM-09 by letting adverse events on unguarded alternate interfaces evade monitoring that assumes primary paths, yet the weakness only affects one narrow slice of the broad monitoring outcome.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require protection of all interfaces, directly addressing unguarded alternate hardware paths.

finds

Security testing can discover alternate-path weaknesses but does not inherently prevent them.

prevents

Information access restriction mandates controls on every path to protected assets, mitigating bypass via shadow or external interfaces.

none

Network security controls can limit exposure of alternate hardware interfaces but do not address internal hardware-level bypasses.

none

Secure coding practices reduce software-level bypasses but do not cover hardware interface protections.

References