Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-49191

Sick Field Analytics

Published
12 June 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0030 22th percentile
Risk Priority 33 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-49191 is a medium-severity Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames (CWE-1021) vulnerability in Sick Field Analytics. Its CVSS base score is 4.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Drive-by Compromise (T1189); ranked at the 22th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A06:2025 Insecure Design

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Linked URLs during the creation of iFrame widgets and dashboards are vulnerable to code execution. The URLs get embedded as iFrame widgets, making it possible to attack other users that access the dashboard by including malicious code. The attack is…

more

only possible if the attacker is authorized to create new dashboards or iFrame widgets.

CWE(s)
CWE-1021

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
attack.mitre.org →
T1056 Input Capture Collection
Adversaries may use methods of capturing user input to obtain credentials or collect information.
attack.mitre.org →
T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-49192Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2025-49196Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2025-49185Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2025-49200Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2025-49187Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2023-5103Same vendor: Sick
CVE-2025-49188Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2025-49190Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2025-49199Same product: Sick Field Analytics
CVE-2026-22918Same vendor: Sick

Affected Assets

sick
field analytics
all versions

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require implementing frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options controls that prevent this weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing can detect missing frame protections, but does not itself implement the control.

A.8.23 Web filtering partial match
degrades

Web filtering can block or sandbox untrusted frames, but does not enforce application-level frame-busting or CSP.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can mandate frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options, directly addressing UI redressing risks.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles include isolation of UI layers and proper use of browser security controls.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding practices directly require implementation of frame-busting headers or CSP frame-ancestors directives.

References