Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-50707

RCE in Thinkphp 3.2.5

Public PoCRCE
Published
05 August 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.010 61th percentile
Risk Priority 77 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-50707 is a critical-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Thinkphp Thinkphp. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 39% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-50707 is a code injection vulnerability, tracked under CWE-94, that affects ThinkPHP version 3.2.5. The flaw resides in the index.php component and permits remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server. It carries a CVSS 3.1 base score of 9.8, reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, and no required privileges or user interaction, resulting in complete confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted request to the index.php endpoint and achieve arbitrary code execution on the affected ThinkPHP installation, allowing full system compromise without any prior access.

Public references consist of technical write-ups hosted on xinyisleep.github.io that detail the issue and reference a related Chinese vulnerability identifier (CNVD-2024-39045), though no official vendor advisory or patch information is supplied in the available data.

The EPSS score remains flat at 0.0440 with no observed increase after disclosure, and no reports of active exploitation are present in the provided details.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue in thinkphp3 v.3.2.5 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the index.php component

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.002 AppleScript Execution
Adversaries may abuse AppleScript for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.005 Visual Basic Execution
Adversaries may abuse Visual Basic (VB) for execution.
T1059.006 Python Execution
Adversaries may abuse Python commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-50706Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2025-63889Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2024-44902Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2024-48112Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2018-25270Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2025-63888Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2024-34467Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2019-9082Same product: Thinkphp Thinkphp
CVE-2026-1340Shared CWE-94
CVE-2024-54724Shared CWE-94

Affected Assets

thinkphp
thinkphp
3.2.5

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.

Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.

Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.

Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).

PR.DS-10 none match
prevents

PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.

none

Controls that restrict unauthorized or malicious code from being introduced via external networks or removable media limit opportunities for an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code.

References