Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-5241

Published
11 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0039 32th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-5241 is a medium-severity Overly Restrictive Account Lockout Mechanism (CWE-645) vulnerability in Cisa (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Account Access Removal (T1531); ranked at the 32th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-7 (Unsuccessful Logon Attempts) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Overly Restrictive Account Lockout Mechanism vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-F Series allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to lockout legitimate users for a certain period by repeatedly attempting to login with incorrect passwords. The legitimate users will be unable…

more

to login until a certain period has passed after the lockout or until the product is reset.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1531 Account Access Removal Impact
Adversaries may interrupt availability of system and network resources by inhibiting access to accounts utilized by legitimate users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-4346Shared CWE-645
CVE-2026-53982Shared CWE-645
CVE-2026-25907Shared CWE-645
CVE-2024-1722Shared CWE-645
CVE-2025-31947Shared CWE-645
CVE-2024-37028Shared CWE-645

Affected Assets

Cisa
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Properly tuned thresholds and lock durations in the unsuccessful logon control stop an overly sensitive lockout from being introduced or exploited for DoS.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-01 mostly match
prevents

Credential management policies directly govern lockout thresholds and reset procedures.

PR.AA-03 mostly match
prevents

Authentication policies include lockout parameters that must not be overly restrictive.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Authorization policy definition and review encompass account lockout rules and exceptions.

DE.CM-03 partial match
prevents

Monitoring can detect resulting lockouts but does not prevent an overly restrictive mechanism.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Access control policy should define lockout thresholds and recovery procedures to avoid overly restrictive denial-of-service.

degrades

Authentication information management includes setting lockout parameters that balance security against accidental lockouts.

degrades

Access rights administration must include procedures for unlocking accounts and reviewing lockout events.

degrades

Secure authentication mechanisms directly specify lockout thresholds, unlock processes, and monitoring to prevent abuse.

References