Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-52989

Juniper Junos ≤ 22.2

Published
11 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 6.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:U/V:X/RE:M/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0012 2th percentile
Risk Priority 22 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-52989 is a medium-severity Improper Neutralization of Delimiters (CWE-140) vulnerability in Juniper Junos. Its CVSS base score is 6.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 2th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An Improper Neutralization of Delimiters vulnerability in the UI of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows a local, authenticated attacker with high privileges to modify the system configuration. A user with limited configuration and commit permissions, using…

more

a specifically crafted annotate configuration command, can change any part of the device configuration. This issue affects: Junos OS: * all versions before 22.2R3-S7, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S7, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S1, * 24.4 versions before 24.4R1-S2, 24.4R2; Junos OS Evolved: * all versions before 22.4R3-S7-EVO, * 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO, * 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO, * 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO * 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R2-EVO.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-39542Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2024-21598Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2024-39515Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2025-52949Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-33793Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2023-28964Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2023-44204Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2024-30386Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2024-39564Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2023-0026Same product: Juniper Junos

Affected Assets

juniper
junos
22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2 · ≤ 22.2
juniper
junos os evolved
22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, 24.4 · ≤ 22.4

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect delimiter neutralization through targeted test cases.

Input validation directly enforces neutralization of delimiters before they reach parsers or interpreters.

Secure engineering principles include explicit requirements for proper delimiter handling and sanitization.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper delimiter neutralization during input handling and output encoding.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect delimiter-related weaknesses before deployment.

prevents

Secure development life cycle incorporates practices that reduce the likelihood of delimiter-neutralization defects.

prevents

Application security requirements include input validation and output encoding that mitigate delimiter mishandling.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly requires proper neutralization of delimiters to prevent injection and parsing flaws.

References