CVE-2025-53005
Dataease ≤ 2.10.11
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-53005 is a high-severity Improper Neutralization of Substitution Characters (CWE-153) vulnerability in Dataease Dataease. Its CVSS base score is 8.9 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-19595
Vulnerability Data
DataEase is an open source business intelligence and data visualization tool. Prior to version 2.10.11, there is a bypass vulnerability in Dataease's PostgreSQL Data Source JDBC Connection Parameters. The sslfactory and sslfactoryarg parameters could trigger a bypass vulnerability. This issue…
more
has been patched in version 2.10.11.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.9V1.2.10
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Input validation directly requires neutralizing or rejecting dangerous substitution characters before they reach a downstream interpreter.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization of substitution characters.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect substitution-character flaws but does not itself implement neutralization.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and sanitization that directly prevents substitution-character injection.
Application security requirements explicitly call for neutralizing special elements before downstream processing.
Secure coding standards require proper neutralization of substitution characters in all input handling.