Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-54255

Adobe Acrobat 24.0.0 – 24.001.30264

Published
09 September 2025
Modified
02 October 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0027 19th percentile
Risk Priority 34 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-54255 is a medium-severity Violation of Secure Design Principles (CWE-657) vulnerability in Adobe Acrobat. Its CVSS base score is 4.0 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 19th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-5 (Separation of Duties) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30254, 20.005.30774, 25.001.20672 and earlier are affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass impacting integrity. An attacker does not have to be authenticated. Exploitation of this issue…

more

does not require user interaction, and scope is unchanged.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-29320Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-38231Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-44338Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-38244Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2024-41834Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-22242Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-29299Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2023-26406Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2021-28560Same product: Adobe Acrobat
CVE-2024-20733Same product: Adobe Acrobat

Affected Assets

adobe
acrobat
24.0.0 — 24.001.30264 · 20.001.30002 — 20.005.30793 · 20.001.30002 — 20.005.30791
adobe
acrobat dc
15.008.20082 — 25.001.20693
adobe
acrobat reader dc
15.008.20082 — 25.001.20693
adobe
acrobat reader
20.001.30002 — 20.005.30791 · 20.001.30002 — 20.005.30791

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 8 hardening rules · 5 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Explicitly requires application of security and privacy engineering principles throughout the lifecycle, structurally preventing their violation.

Separation of duties is a core secure design principle whose mandated implementation directly stops the violation from occurring.

Least privilege is a fundamental secure design principle whose enforcement prevents the violation from being introduced.

Mandates separation of user and system functionality, a classic secure design principle that stops the violation at design time.

Requires isolation of security functions, directly preventing violation of that established design principle.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Directly mandates integration of secure development practices including design principles across the SDLC.

GV.PO-01 partial match
prevents

Establishes risk-management policy that can embed secure design expectations at the organizational level.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Explicitly requires incorporating least privilege, one key secure design principle.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles are the explicit embodiment of the secure design principles violated by CWE-657.

degrades

A secure development life cycle directly requires adherence to established secure design principles.

finds

Security testing can detect violations of secure design principles before release.

prevents

Embedding security in project management helps enforce secure design principles from the outset.

degrades

Secure coding practices help realize secure design principles at implementation time.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Ubuntu 22.04 (1 rule)
  • V-260559 Ubuntu 22.04 LTS must ensure only users who need access to security functions are part of sudo group. prevents CWE-657
Ubuntu 24.04 (1 rule)
  • V-270748 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS must ensure only users who need access to security functions are part of sudo group. prevents CWE-657
Windows Server 2016 (2 rules)
  • V-224992 Domain Controller PKI certificates must be issued by the DoD PKI or an approved External Certificate Authority (ECA). prevents CWE-657
  • V-224993 PKI certificates associated with user accounts must be issued by the DoD PKI or an approved External Certificate Authority (ECA). prevents CWE-657
Windows Server 2019 (2 rules)
  • V-205646 Windows Server 2019 domain Controller PKI certificates must be issued by the DoD PKI or an approved External Certificate Authority (ECA). prevents CWE-657
  • V-205647 Windows Server 2019 PKI certificates associated with user accounts must be issued by a DoD PKI or an approved External Certificate Authority (ECA). prevents CWE-657
Windows Server 2022 (2 rules)
  • V-254413 Windows Server 2022 domain Controller PKI certificates must be issued by the DoD PKI or an approved External Certificate Authority (ECA). prevents CWE-657
  • V-254414 Windows Server 2022 PKI certificates associated with user accounts must be issued by a DoD PKI or an approved External Certificate Authority (ECA). prevents CWE-657

References