Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-55129

Aquaplatform Revive Adserver 6.0.0 – 6.0.4

Public PoC
Published
02 December 2025
Modified
30 December 2025
CVSS Score v3 5.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0024 15th percentile
Risk Priority 42 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-55129 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Unicode Encoding (CWE-176) vulnerability in Aquaplatform Revive Adserver. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Invisible Unicode (T1027.018); ranked at the 15th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

HackerOne community member Kassem S.(kassem_s94) has reported that username handling in Revive Adserver was still vulnerable to impersonation attacks after the fix for CVE-2025-52672, via several alternate techniques. Homoglyphs based impersonation has been independently reported by other HackerOne users, such…

more

as itz_hari_ and khoof.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1027.018 Invisible Unicode Stealth
Adversaries may abuse invisible or non-printing Unicode characters to conceal malicious content within files, scripts, or text.
T1027 Obfuscated Files or Information Stealth
Adversaries may attempt to make an executable or file difficult to discover or analyze by encrypting, encoding, or otherwise obfuscating its contents on the system or in transit.
T1132 Data Encoding Command And Control
Adversaries may encode data to make the content of command and control traffic more difficult to detect.
T1132.002 Non-Standard Encoding Command And Control
Adversaries may encode data with a non-standard data encoding system to make the content of command and control traffic more difficult to detect.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-21640Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2026-21663Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2026-21664Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2025-55126Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2026-21642Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2026-21641Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2025-55127Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2025-55128Same product: Aquaplatform Revive Adserver
CVE-2025-71316Shared CWE-176
CVE-2026-4116Shared CWE-176

Affected Assets

aquaplatform
revive adserver
6.0.0 — 6.0.4

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly requires checking and normalizing encodings so that Unicode is handled consistently before further processing.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper Unicode/input validation to prevent this weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect Unicode-handling flaws before deployment.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and encoding handling that can prevent Unicode mishandling.

prevents

Application security requirements include proper handling of character encodings and input sanitization.

prevents

Secure architecture principles require robust input processing to avoid encoding-related vulnerabilities.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address proper Unicode and character-encoding validation.

References