Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-55271

Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud 1.0.0

Published
26 March 2026
Modified
26 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 3.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0032 24th percentile
Risk Priority 28 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-55271 is a low-severity HTTP Request/Response Splitting (CWE-113) vulnerability in Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud. Its CVSS base score is 3.1 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 24th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-15 (Information Output Filtering) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-55271 is an HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability (CWE-113) affecting HCL Aftermarket DPC. Published on 2026-03-26T13:16:26.567, it has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 3.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N), indicating low severity with network accessibility but high attack complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction needed.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability over the network by inducing response splitting. Depending on how the affected web application processes the split response, the attacker may execute arbitrary commands or inject harmful content, potentially leading to low-impact confidentiality disclosure.

The HCL support knowledge base article at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0129793 provides details on mitigation and related advisories for this vulnerability.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability where in depending on how the web application handles the split response, an attacker may be able to execute arbitrary commands or inject harmful content into the response..

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-55274Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55264Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55262Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55268Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55265Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55275Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55261Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55269Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55267Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud
CVE-2025-55263Same product: Hcltech Aftermarket Cloud

Affected Assets

hcltech
aftermarket cloud
1.0.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.4.2
  • V4.1.3
  • V1.3.6
  • V4.2.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation stops unneutralized CR/LF characters from being accepted and later emitted in HTTP headers.

Output filtering can neutralize CRLF sequences before they reach HTTP response headers.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input sanitization and header handling that prevent CRLF injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect CRLF injection flaws before deployment.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevents CRLF injection into HTTP headers.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including HTTP header manipulation.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the likelihood of header-splitting vulnerabilities through proper component isolation.

prevents

Secure coding standards require neutralization of CRLF sequences before inclusion in HTTP headers.

A.8.15 Logging none match
none

Logging of HTTP traffic can record header-splitting attempts, aiding detection and forensics.

References