Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-56571

DoS in Ebradyjobory Finance.Js 4.1.0

Published
30 September 2025
Modified
05 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0040 33th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-56571 is a high-severity Excessive Iteration (CWE-834) vulnerability in Ebradyjobory Finance.Js. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 33th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Finance.js v4.1.0 contains a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability via the IRR function’s depth parameter. Improper handling of the recursion/iteration limit can lead to excessive CPU usage, causing application stalls or crashes.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-56572Same product: Ebradyjobory Finance.Js
CVE-2025-55181Shared CWE-834
CVE-2023-49316Shared CWE-834
CVE-2026-64641Shared CWE-834
CVE-2026-41313Shared CWE-834
CVE-2024-8049Shared CWE-834
CVE-2026-48156Shared CWE-834
CVE-2024-4227Shared CWE-834
CVE-2023-5632Shared CWE-834
CVE-2024-42071Shared CWE-834

Affected Assets

ebradyjobory
finance.js
4.1.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Engineering principles can require developers to bound all loops and iterations at design time.

Resource quotas limit the CPU/time impact of an excessively long loop without eliminating the flaw.

Input validation can reject or sanitize data that would otherwise drive unbounded iteration.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent unbounded loops via code review, static analysis, and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect excessive iteration through stress and fuzz testing.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle requires input validation and loop bounds, directly limiting excessive iteration.

prevents

Application security requirements include resource-consumption limits that prevent unbounded loops.

prevents

Secure architecture principles mandate defensive coding patterns such as loop termination checks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unbounded loops and require explicit iteration limits.

References