CVE-2025-57707
Qnap File Station 5.5.6.4691 – 5.5.6.5190
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-57707 is a low-severity Static Code Injection (CWE-96) vulnerability in Qnap File Station. Its CVSS base score is 1.1 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 48th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-57707 is an improper neutralization of directives in statically saved code vulnerability, classified as Static Code Injection (CWE-96), affecting File Station 5 in QNAP devices. Published on 2026-02-11, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), highlighting its high severity due to significant impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
A remote attacker who has obtained a user account on the affected system can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low attack complexity and no user interaction. Exploitation enables the attacker to access restricted data and files that would otherwise be unavailable to their privilege level.
QNAP's security advisory (QSA-26-03) confirms the vulnerability has been fixed in File Station 5 version 5.5.6.5166 and later. Administrators should update to a patched version and consult https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-26-03 for full mitigation guidance.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-207408
Vulnerability Data
An improper neutralization of directives in statically saved code ('Static Code Injection') vulnerability has been reported to affect File Station 5. If a remote attacker gains a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to access restricted data /…
more
files. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: File Station 5 5.5.6.5166 and later
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing neutralization of directives in saved code artifacts.
Input validation directly stops unneutralized directives from being inserted into static code resources.
Engineering principles include secure input handling and neutralization requirements that structurally avoid static injection.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization to block static code injection into templates, configs, or libraries.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance will detect static code injection but does not prevent it at the source.
Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and sanitization that directly prevents static code injection.
Application security requirements include rules for neutralizing untrusted input before it is stored in executable resources.
Secure architecture principles reduce injection surfaces but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques.
Secure coding explicitly requires proper neutralization of directives in templates, libraries and configuration files.
Change management can catch unsafe code changes but does not enforce input neutralization.