CVE-2025-5826
Autel Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware ≤ 1.39.51
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:LSummary
CVE-2025-5826 is a medium-severity Misinterpretation of Input (CWE-115) vulnerability in Autel Maxicharger Ac Elite Business C50 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Masquerading (T1036); ranked at the 14th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-28668
Vulnerability Data
Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial ble_process_esp32_msg Misinterpretation of Input Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to inject arbitrary AT commands on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial charging stations. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The…
more
specific flaw exists within the ble_process_esp32_msg function. The issue results from misinterpretation of input data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute AT commands in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-26368.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Input validation directly stops the system from accepting and acting on misinterpreted data values.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require correct input parsing/validation to avoid misinterpretation flaws.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect input misinterpretation flaws but does not itself implement the preventive controls.
Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and canonicalization that directly prevent misinterpretation of inputs.
Application security requirements explicitly call for robust input handling and sanitization to avoid misinterpretation.
Secure architecture principles include defensive input processing and error handling that reduce misinterpretation risks.
Secure coding standards require strict input validation and canonical forms to eliminate misinterpretation vulnerabilities.