Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-59457

Jetbrains Teamcity ≤ 2025.07.2

Published
17 September 2025
Modified
22 September 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0075 52th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-59457 is a high-severity Permissive List of Allowed Inputs (CWE-183) vulnerability in Jetbrains Teamcity. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A06:2025 Insecure Design

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2025.07.2 missing Git URL validation allowed credential leakage on Windows

CWE(s)
CWE-183

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-29880Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2023-50870Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-67742Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2023-34227Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-54528Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-54529Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2026-49372Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-54536Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2024-27199Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2024-24938Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity

Affected Assets

jetbrains
teamcity
≤ 2025.07.2

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.5.2
  • V4.4.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Strict validity checks on inputs directly stop overly permissive allow lists from being used as the protection mechanism.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require rigorous allow-list design and testing that prevents permissive input validation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing can detect overly broad allow-lists, but does not inherently prevent their creation.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can mandate strict, minimal allow-lists and input validation rules that prevent overly permissive lists.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require explicit, least-privilege input validation designs that directly address permissive allow-lists.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards enforce rigorous input validation and reject unsafe values, mitigating permissive allow-list weaknesses.

A.8.9 Configuration management none match
none

Configuration management can enforce validated input rules, yet does not directly address the design flaw of permissive lists.

References