Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-62484

Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit ≤ 6.5.10

Published
13 November 2025
Modified
19 November 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0030 22th percentile
Risk Priority 59 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-62484 is a high-severity Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity (CWE-1333) vulnerability in Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 22th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-62484 is a high-severity vulnerability stemming from inefficient regular expression complexity (CWE-1333) in certain Zoom Workplace Clients prior to version 6.5.10. This flaw affects the client software, enabling potential exploitation through crafted network input that triggers excessive computation during regex processing, commonly known as a ReDoS (Regular Expression Denial of Service) condition adapted for privilege escalation.

An unauthenticated attacker (PR:N) with network access (AV:N) can exploit this vulnerability with low complexity (AC:L), though it requires user interaction (UI:R), such as a user clicking a malicious link or accepting a connection in a Zoom session. Successful exploitation leads to escalation of privilege, granting high confidentiality (C:H) and integrity (I:H) impacts without affecting availability (A:N) or changing scope (S:U), as scored at CVSS 8.1 (CVSS:3.1). The attacker could potentially manipulate client privileges to access sensitive data or alter application behavior.

Zoom's security bulletin (ZSB-25048) advises updating affected Zoom Workplace Clients to version 6.5.10 or later as the primary mitigation, addressing the regex inefficiency to prevent exploitation.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Inefficient regular expression complexity in certain Zoom Workplace Clients before version 6.5.10 may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via network access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-53408Same product: Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit
CVE-2025-0150Same product: Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit
CVE-2025-49460Same product: Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit
CVE-2024-45420Same product: Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit
CVE-2023-36533Same product: Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit
CVE-2024-27243Same product: Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit
CVE-2023-39210Same product: Zoom Meeting Software Development Kit
CVE-2026-53407Same product: Zoom Workplace
CVE-2026-30904Same product: Zoom Workplace
CVE-2023-39203Same vendor: Zoom

Affected Assets

zoom
meeting software development kit
≤ 6.5.10 · ≤ 6.5.10
zoom
workplace
≤ 6.5.10 · ≤ 6.5.10

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover inefficient regex patterns via performance or static analysis.

Development standards and tools can require safe regex construction and forbid known exponential patterns.

Denial-of-service protections limit resource exhaustion caused by expensive regex evaluation.

Input validation can constrain data that would otherwise trigger worst-case regex complexity.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent inefficient regex via reviews, static analysis, and safe libraries.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover ReDoS issues in existing code but do not stop their introduction.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect and reject regex patterns with exponential worst-case complexity.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates review of algorithmic efficiency, directly addressing ReDoS-prone regex.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify input-validation rules that limit regex complexity.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage avoidance of computationally expensive constructs such as catastrophic backtracking.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly prohibit or limit the use of inefficient regular expressions.

References