Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-62676

Fortinet Forticlient 7.0.0 – 7.2.13

Published
10 February 2026
Modified
12 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0021 12th percentile
Risk Priority 51 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-62676 is a high-severity Link Following (CWE-59) vulnerability in Fortinet Forticlient. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Path Interception (T1034); ranked at the 12th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-6 (Least Privilege) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-62676 is an Improper Link Resolution Before File Access vulnerability, classified under CWE-59, affecting Fortinet FortiClient for Windows in versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, and all versions of 7.0. The issue stems from improper handling that may allow exploitation through crafted named pipe messages, resulting in a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.1 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H).

A local attacker with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability to perform an arbitrary file write operation with elevated permissions. This requires local access to the system but no user interaction, enabling the attacker to overwrite critical files and potentially escalate privileges or disrupt system integrity and availability.

Mitigation details are available in the Fortinet product security incident response team advisory at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-25-661, published on 2026-02-10. Security practitioners should consult this reference for patching instructions and workarounds specific to the affected FortiClient versions.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability [CWE-59] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiClientWindows 7.0 all versions may allow a local low-privilege attacker to perform an arbitrary file write with elevated…

more

permissions via crafted named pipe messages.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1034 Path Interception Persistence
**This technique has been deprecated.
T1547.009 Shortcut Modification Persistence
Adversaries may create or modify shortcuts that can execute a program during system boot or user login.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-24018Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2024-36507Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2023-41840Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2025-57716Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2025-25251Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2025-46373Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2024-52968Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2024-35282Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2023-22635Same product: Fortinet Forticlient
CVE-2024-31489Same product: Fortinet Forticlient

Affected Assets

fortinet
forticlient
7.0.0 — 7.2.13 · 7.4.0 — 7.4.5

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V15.4.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Proper enforcement of access authorizations on the resolved target resource stops a link from reaching an unintended object.

Least-privilege limits the damage an attacker can cause after following an unintended link.

Validating file-name inputs can reject or canonicalize names that resolve to links before access occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require code to validate paths and avoid unsafe link following.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect link-following flaws before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices can mandate link-resolution checks and canonicalization before file access.

prevents

Application security requirements can explicitly require safe handling of symbolic links and path traversal.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include input validation and safe file-access design patterns.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address canonicalization and symlink attacks during implementation.

mitigates

Access-control rules can limit which files are reachable, reducing exposure to malicious links.

References