Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-63522

Feehicms 2.1.1

Public PoC
Published
01 December 2025
Modified
02 December 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0019 9th percentile
Risk Priority 36 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-63522 is a medium-severity Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames (CWE-1021) vulnerability in Feehi Feehicms. Its CVSS base score is 4.6 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Drive-by Compromise (T1189); ranked at the 9th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Reverse Tabnabbing vulnerability in FeehiCMS 2.1.1 in the Comments Management function

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
T1056 Input Capture Collection
Adversaries may use methods of capturing user input to obtain credentials or collect information.
T1557 Adversary-in-the-Middle Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to position themselves between two or more networked devices using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique to support follow-on behaviors such as [Network Sniffing](https://attack.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-63520Same product: Feehi Feehicms
CVE-2025-63523Same product: Feehi Feehicms
CVE-2024-8294Same product: Feehi Feehicms
CVE-2025-15264Same product: Feehi Feehicms
CVE-2024-8295Same product: Feehi Feehicms
CVE-2025-65657Same product: Feehi Feehicms
CVE-2024-8296Same product: Feehi Feehicms
CVE-2026-10733Shared CWE-1021
CVE-2023-20913Shared CWE-1021
CVE-2026-12348Shared CWE-1021

Affected Assets

feehi
feehicms
2.1.1

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require implementing frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options controls that prevent this weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing frame protections, but does not itself implement the control.

degrades

Web filtering can block or sandbox untrusted frames, but does not enforce application-level frame-busting or CSP.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate frame-ancestors / X-Frame-Options, directly addressing UI redressing risks.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include isolation of UI layers and proper use of browser security controls.

prevents

Secure coding practices directly require implementation of frame-busting headers or CSP frame-ancestors directives.

References