Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-64646

Ibm Concert 1.0.0 – 2.2.0

Published
25 March 2026
Modified
26 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0017 7th percentile
Risk Priority 46 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-64646 is a medium-severity Compiler Removal of Code to Clear Buffers (CWE-14) vulnerability in Ibm Concert. Its CVSS base score is 6.2 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique OS Credential Dumping (T1003); ranked at the 7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 2.2.0 could allow an attacker to access sensitive information in memory due to the buffer not properly clearing resources.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1003 OS Credential Dumping Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to dump credentials to obtain account login and credential material, normally in the form of a hash or a clear text password.
T1552 Unsecured Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may search compromised systems to find and obtain insecurely stored credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-1721Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2025-33101Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2025-1722Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2025-1719Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2025-33100Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2025-1759Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2025-33089Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2024-49827Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2024-49354Same product: Ibm Concert
CVE-2025-36440Same product: Ibm Concert

Affected Assets

ibm
concert
1.0.0 — 2.2.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can include static analysis or binary inspection that reveals compiler removal of buffer-clearing stores.

Security engineering principles applied during design and implementation can mandate use of volatile qualifiers, explicit_bzero, or similar techniques that survive dead-store elimination.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 full match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices include compiler-aware mitigations (volatile, memset_s) that prevent this exact weakness.

PR.DS-10 mostly match
prevents

Explicitly requires removing confidential data from process memory when no longer needed, directly addressing dead-store removal of buffer clears.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect residual sensitive data left by dead-store removal, but does not prevent the weakness itself.

prevents

A secure SDLC can include compiler-flag and code-review requirements that mitigate dead-store removal, yet the control is broader.

prevents

Secure coding rules can mandate explicit volatile or memory-clearing patterns that survive compiler optimization.

References