Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-6514

RCE

Published
09 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 9.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.78 99.5th percentile
Risk Priority 93 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-6514 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Jfrog (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 9.6 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 0.5% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as AI Agent Protocols and Integrations; in the Protocol-Specific Risks risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-6514 is an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in mcp-remote that arises when the client processes a crafted authorization_endpoint response URL returned by an untrusted MCP server. The flaw received a CVSS 3.1 score of 9.6, reflecting network attack vector, low complexity, no required privileges, and high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability with changed scope.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the issue by hosting a malicious MCP server that supplies malicious input in the authorization_endpoint field; when a user connects to that server, the injected commands execute on the client system, enabling full remote code execution.

A patch addressing the command-injection vector was merged in commit 607b226a356cb61a239ffaba2fb3db1c9dea4bac of the mcp-remote repository, and JFrog has published detailed analysis and mitigation guidance.

The EPSS score rose to a peak of 0.1606 before settling at the current value of 0.1217, indicating measurable post-disclosure exploitation interest.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

mcp-remote is exposed to OS command injection when connecting to untrusted MCP servers due to crafted input from the authorization_endpoint response URL

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
AI Agent Protocols and Integrations
Risk Domain
Protocol-Specific Risks
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: mcp

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-64340Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-5058Shared CWE-78
CVE-2025-54382Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-0756Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-41208Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-23882Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-56274Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-25130Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-12940Shared CWE-78
CVE-2026-5059Shared CWE-78

Affected Assets

Jfrog
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References