Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-67848

Moodle ≤ 4.1.22

Published
03 February 2026
Modified
11 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0037 30th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-67848 is a high-severity Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges (CWE-280) vulnerability in Moodle Moodle. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-2 (Account Management) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-67848, published on 2026-02-03, is an authentication bypass vulnerability in Moodle's Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI) Provider. The flaw stems from LTI authentication handlers failing to enforce a user's suspension status, allowing suspended users to authenticate and gain unauthorized access to the system. This can result in information disclosure or other unauthorized actions by restricted users. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N) and is associated with CWE-280.

The vulnerability requires low privileges (PR:L), typically held by suspended users, and can be exploited over the network with low complexity and no user interaction. An attacker with a suspended account can authenticate through the LTI Provider, bypassing suspension checks, to achieve high impacts on confidentiality and integrity, such as accessing sensitive data or performing unauthorized modifications.

Advisories and discussions on mitigation are available from Red Hat at https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-67848, Red Hat Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2423831, and Moodle forums at https://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=471298.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in Moodle. This authentication bypass vulnerability allows suspended users to authenticate through the Learning Tools Interoperability (LTI) Provider. The issue arises from the LTI authentication handlers failing to enforce the user's suspension status, enabling unauthorized access…

more

to the system. This can lead to information disclosure or other unauthorized actions by users who should be restricted.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1078 Valid Accounts Stealth
Adversaries may obtain and abuse credentials of existing accounts as a means of gaining Initial Access, Persistence, Privilege Escalation, or Defense Evasion.
Why these techniques?

Auth bypass in public-facing Moodle LTI directly enables exploitation of the web app (T1190) and use of suspended but otherwise valid accounts (T1078).

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-3642Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-3641Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-26530Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-3637Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-3634Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-26533Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-3638Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-3635Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2026-26045Same product: Moodle Moodle
CVE-2025-67847Same product: Moodle Moodle

Affected Assets

moodle
moodle
5.1.0 · ≤ 4.1.22 · 4.4.0 — 4.4.11 · 4.5.0 — 4.5.8

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • AC-3 Access Enforcement
  • AC-2 Account Management
  • IA-2 Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V6.2.2
  • V8.3.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

AC-3 mandates enforcement of approved authorizations, directly addressing the LTI handlers' failure to check and block suspended users during authentication.

prevent

AC-2 requires proper account management including suspension and disabling of accounts, ensuring suspension status is propagated and enforced across all authentication paths like LTI.

prevent

IA-2 establishes identification and authentication for organizational users, requiring mechanisms that verify user status to mitigate bypasses in specialized protocols such as LTI Provider.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 mostly match
prevents

Defining, enforcing and reviewing access permissions with least privilege directly prevents code paths that mishandle insufficient privileges.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data surfaces adverse events triggered by unhandled permission failures.

PR.PS-04 partial match
prevents

Generating logs of permission-related events enables detection and analysis of improper handling.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect missing or incorrect privilege handling.

prevents

Defines access-control policy that should prevent insufficient-privilege situations.

degrades

Specifies how access rights are granted, reviewed and revoked, directly addressing privilege handling.

degrades

Requires explicit management of privileged access rights, reducing the chance of missing privilege checks.

prevents

Secure-SDLC practices include privilege checks during design and coding.

prevents

Secure-coding standards require proper permission checks before resource access.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that reduce the attack surface for weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Derived transitively via CVE→CWE→STIG over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248548 OL 8 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. via CWE-280

References