Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-7096

Comodo Internet Security 12.3.4.8162

Public PoC
Published
06 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v4 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0039 32th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-7096 is a high-severity Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity (CWE-345) vulnerability in Comodo Internet Security. Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Mark-of-the-Web Bypass (T1553.005); ranked at the 32th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-13 (Cryptographic Protection) and SC-23 (Session Authenticity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A08:2025 Software or Data Integrity Failures

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Comodo Internet Security Premium 12.3.4.8162. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file cis_update_x64.xml of the component Manifest File Handler. The manipulation leads to improper validation of integrity check value. The attack…

more

can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)
CWE-345CWE-354

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1553.005 Mark-of-the-Web Bypass Defense Impairment
Adversaries may abuse specific file formats to subvert Mark-of-the-Web (MOTW) controls.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195 Supply Chain Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate products or product delivery mechanisms prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195.001 Compromise Software Dependencies and Development Tools Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate software dependencies and development tools prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1195.002 Compromise Software Supply Chain Initial Access
Adversaries may manipulate application software prior to receipt by a final consumer for the purpose of data or system compromise.
attack.mitre.org →
T1542.002 Component Firmware Stealth
Adversaries may modify component firmware to persist on systems.
attack.mitre.org →
T1553 Subvert Trust Controls Defense Impairment
Adversaries may undermine security controls that will either warn users of untrusted activity or prevent execution of untrusted programs.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-7095Same product: Comodo Internet Security
CVE-2024-7251Same product: Comodo Internet Security
CVE-2024-7252Same product: Comodo Internet Security
CVE-2025-7098Same product: Comodo Internet Security
CVE-2024-7250Same product: Comodo Internet Security
CVE-2025-7097Same product: Comodo Internet Security
CVE-2024-7248Same product: Comodo Internet Security
CVE-2026-40323Shared CWE-345, CWE-354
CVE-2026-26007Shared CWE-345, CWE-354
CVE-2023-28386Shared CWE-345, CWE-354

Affected Assets

comodo
internet security
12.3.4.8162

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 18 hardening rules · 5 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.5.5
  • V10.4.12

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SC-23 Session Authenticity good match

Explicit requirement to protect session authenticity structurally prevents the weakness for communications.

SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity good match

Requires integrity verification tools that detect unauthorized changes when checksum validation is missing or flawed.

SC-13 Cryptographic Protection good match

Mandates cryptographic mechanisms that include integrity protection, preventing improper checksum validation.

SC-8 Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity good match

Requires protection of transmitted information integrity, directly mandating correct validation of integrity checks.

SC-16 Transmission of Security and Privacy Attributes partial match

Associating security attributes with exchanged information supports verification of authenticity.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.DS-01 mostly match
prevents

Requires cryptographic hashes and signatures that directly enforce integrity-check validation for data at rest.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Requires cryptographic hashes and signatures that directly enforce integrity-check validation for data in transit.

RC.RP-05 mostly match
degrades

CWE-345 directly impairs RC.RP-05's verification of restored-asset integrity/authenticity, largely defeating the outcome while still leaving other restoration-confirmation steps partially viable.

ID.RA-09 partial match
prevents

Mandates pre-acquisition integrity assessment, addressing only the initial portion of the weakness lifecycle.

RC.RP-03 partial match
prevents

Requires verification of backup integrity, covering validation only within recovery scenarios.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.24 Use of cryptography mostly match
prevents

Cryptographic controls mandate integrity mechanisms whose correct validation directly prevents CWE-354.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding standards require proper implementation and validation of checksums or MACs.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing can detect missing or weak data authenticity verification.

A.8.20 Networks security partial match
mitigates

Network controls can enforce authenticated channels, reducing risk of accepting unauthentic data.

A.8.21 Security of network services partial match
mitigates

Secure network services often include authenticity checks for data exchanged over those services.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC incorporates authenticity verification requirements throughout development.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (2 rules)
  • V-248574 YUM must be configured to prevent the installation of patches, service packs, device drivers, or OL 8 system components that have not been digitally signed using a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345, CWE-354
  • V-248575 OL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345, CWE-354
Oracle Linux 9 (2 rules)
  • V-271523 OL 9 must check the GPG signature of locally installed software packages before installation. prevents CWE-354
  • V-271525 OL 9 must have GPG signature verification enabled for all software repositories. prevents CWE-345
RHEL 7 (2 rules)
  • V-204447 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components from a repository without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345, CWE-354
  • V-204448 The Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345, CWE-354
RHEL 8 (2 rules)
  • V-230264 RHEL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components from a repository without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345, CWE-354
  • V-230265 RHEL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. prevents CWE-345, CWE-354
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-257822 RHEL 9 must have GPG signature verification enabled for all software repositories. prevents CWE-345

References