Security Resilience

CVE-2026-101937

Published
14 October 2026
Modified
15 October 2026
CVSS Score v4 7.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0027 18th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-101937 is a high-severity Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error (CWE-195) vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Data Obfuscation (T1001); ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A Signed to Unsigned Conversion Error vulnerability in the srxpfe of Juniper Networks Junos OS on the SRX Series allows an adjacent attacker to cause a denial of service of the data plane via chassis-cluster fabric traffic.

CWE(s)
CWE-195

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001 Data Obfuscation Command And Control
Adversaries may obfuscate command and control traffic to make it more difficult to detect.
attack.mitre.org →
T1003.001 LSASS Memory Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credential material stored in the process memory of the Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS).
attack.mitre.org →
T1003.003 NTDS Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access or create a copy of the Active Directory domain database in order to steal credential information, as well as obtain other information about domain members such as devices, users, and access rights.
attack.mitre.org →
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
attack.mitre.org →
T1003.008 /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to dump the contents of <code>/etc/passwd</code> and <code>/etc/shadow</code> to enable offline password cracking.
attack.mitre.org →
T1006 Direct Volume Access Stealth
Adversaries may directly access a volume to bypass file access controls and file system monitoring.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-24792Shared CWE-195
CVE-2024-25388Shared CWE-195
CVE-2026-74221Shared CWE-195
CVE-2025-65495Shared CWE-195
CVE-2026-77406Shared CWE-195
CVE-2026-17507Shared CWE-195
CVE-2026-85441Shared CWE-195
CVE-2025-30646Shared CWE-195
CVE-2026-26981Shared CWE-195
CVE-2026-74220Shared CWE-195

Affected Assets

Juniper
Networks Junos
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation partial match

Developer testing and evaluation can discover conversion errors through static analysis, fuzzing, or targeted unit tests.

SA-15 Development Process, Standards, and Tools partial match

Requiring documented development standards and tools can enforce coding rules that prohibit or safely wrap such casts.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Engineering principles can mandate safe integer handling and strong typing to avoid unsafe signed-to-unsigned casts.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices (static analysis, code review, safe-integer standards) directly prevent signed-to-unsigned conversion errors.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems partial match
removes
A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
blocks

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that can catch signed-to-unsigned conversion errors during design and coding.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
blocks

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including resilience against attacks such as buffer overflows or SQL injection) be identified and specified during development or acquisition; it does not itself enforce, implement, or prevent the signed-to-unsigned conversion error from arising or being exploitable.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
blocks

A.8.27 mandates establishing and applying security engineering principles (e.g. least privilege, security by design, hardening) and design reviews during the SDLC; it does not stop a signed-to-unsigned conversion error from being exploitable if the flawed code is written and deployed.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards directly prohibit unsafe signed-to-unsigned casts and require defensive checks.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance partial match
finds

Security testing in development can detect conversion-related defects before release.

References