CVE-2026-103431
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-103431 is a high-severity Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences (CWE-150) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 7th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-90576
Vulnerability Data
colmux in collectl before 4.3.20.2 does not sanitize ANSI/VT100 terminal escape sequences in data received from remote collectl instances before displaying it, allowing a local user on a monitored host to inject escape sequences into the terminal of an operator…
more
running colmux, via a crafted process name (argv[0]).
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.2.10V1.3.12
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
SI-10 requires validation/sanitization of inputs that directly stops escape/meta/control sequences from reaching downstream components.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly require input neutralization and escaping to prevent this class of flaw.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reach escape/sequence neutralization; this prevents exploitation for many instances but leaves a bounded remainder where implementation is incomplete or the specific sequences are missed.
A.8.26 requires identifying and specifying requirements including resilience against SQL injections, input validation, and output controls (items d, j, l, m, n), which when addressed stop exploitation of unneutralized escape sequences; this covers only a minority slice of CWE-150's broader meta/control sequences and downstream contexts, with the bulk left to implementation details in other controls.
A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles including data validation/sanitization, distrusting external input, and design reviews against attack patterns, which reaches a minority slice of improper neutralization (e.g. via secure architecture and hardening) but leaves most instances of missing or incorrect escaping in downstream components unaddressed.
Secure coding standards require proper escaping and neutralization of control characters before downstream processing.