Security Resilience

CVE-2026-106325

Google Chrome ≤ 155.0.8059.39

Published
06 October 2026
Modified
07 October 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0023 13th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-106325 is a medium-severity Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference (CWE-706) vulnerability in Google Chrome. Its CVSS base score is 4.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 13th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Incorrect reference resolution in Core in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-95334Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-106181Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-87547Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-87613Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-95275Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-78985Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-14083Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-17859Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-11095Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-17906Same product: Google Chrome

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 155.0.8059.39

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Network segmentation and routing policies reduce the chance that a mis-resolved name leads to an unintended external resource.

degrades

Segregated networks limit the blast radius when a name or reference resolves outside the intended control sphere.

blocks

Secure SDLC practices include design reviews that can catch incorrect name or reference handling before deployment.

blocks

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including those that could address name-resolution issues) be identified during development or acquisition; it does not itself enforce, implement, or stop exploitation of an incorrectly-resolved name or reference.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security-by-design principles (least privilege, default-deny, distrust-external-input, security-oriented design reviews, hardening) that reach many but not all name-resolution mistakes; a bounded remainder (e.g. flawed resolution logic inside trusted components or libraries) can still be introduced and exploited.

prevents

Secure-coding standards directly address canonicalization, input validation and safe name resolution, mitigating CWE-706.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-706, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References