Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-10984

Google Chrome ≤ 149.0.7827.53

Published
04 June 2026
Modified
22 July 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 5.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0023 14th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-10984 is a medium-severity User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information (CWE-451) vulnerability in Google Chrome. Its CVSS base score is 5.4 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Drive-by Compromise (T1189); ranked at the 14th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) and SC-18 (Mobile Code) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Inappropriate implementation in Accessibility in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1189 Drive-by Compromise Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access to a system through a user visiting a website over the normal course of browsing.
Why these techniques?

Browser UI spoofing via crafted HTML directly enables drive-by compromise (T1189) by tricking users through a malicious web page.

Confidence: MEDIUM · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-9865Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-13987Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-13994Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-13964Same product: Google Android
CVE-2025-12729Same product: Google Android
CVE-2023-0130Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-11175Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-11270Same product: Google Android
CVE-2026-13996Same product: Google Chrome
CVE-2026-13966Same product: Google Chrome

Affected Assets

google
chrome
≤ 149.0.7827.53

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
  • SC-18 Mobile Code
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly addresses the root cause by requiring prompt remediation of the inappropriate Accessibility implementation flaw in Chrome.

SC-18 Mobile Code partial match
prevent

Restricts and validates mobile code (HTML/JS) execution in the browser to reduce the attack surface for UI spoofing via crafted pages.

prevent

Enforces validation of untrusted HTML input to block malformed content that triggers Accessibility-based UI misrepresentation.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly address design and implementation of accurate, non-spoofable UI elements.

PR.AT-01 partial match
prevents

User awareness training helps people recognize and avoid harm from UI misrepresentation such as phishing, but does not prevent the flaw itself.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing can detect UI misrepresentation vulnerabilities before deployment.

prevents

Security awareness training can teach users to recognize UI misrepresentation and phishing attempts.

mitigates

Web filtering can block known phishing sites that exploit UI misrepresentation.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes UI/UX security requirements that can prevent misrepresentation of critical information.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate proper display and validation of critical information in the UI.

prevents

Secure coding practices can prevent UI flaws that obscure or spoof critical information.

References