Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-14454

Tonycoz Imager ≤ 1.033

Published
08 July 2026
Modified
10 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 9.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0037 30th percentile
Risk Priority 71 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-14454 is a critical-severity Unsigned to Signed Conversion Error (CWE-196) vulnerability in Tonycoz Imager. Its CVSS base score is 9.8 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Imager versions before 1.033 for Perl treat unsigned EXIF IFD entry counts as signed. Imager mishandled large EXIF IFD entry count values, treating them as negative numbers. This could lead to an attempt to allocate a block nearly the size…

more

of the address space, which fails and kills the process. An attacker could craft an image with EXIF data that terminates a worker process.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-53901Same product: Tonycoz Imager
CVE-2026-55379Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-53428Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-33174Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-65315Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-35549Shared CWE-789
CVE-2026-40891Shared CWE-789
CVE-2025-26618Shared CWE-789
CVE-2025-27533Shared CWE-789
CVE-2025-20140Shared CWE-789

Affected Assets

tonycoz
imager
≤ 1.033

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover unsigned-to-signed conversion errors through targeted test cases or analysis.

Input validation directly rejects or bounds untrusted size values before any allocation occurs.

Requiring documented development standards and tools can mandate safe integer handling and prohibit unsafe casts.

Security engineering principles can include explicit rules for safe type conversion and arithmetic operations.

Resource quotas and priority allocation limit the system-wide impact of an oversized request.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (reviews, static analysis, safe integer handling) directly prevent unsigned-to-signed conversion errors during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect integer conversion errors through static analysis and fuzzing.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates practices that can catch or prevent unsafe type conversions.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify safe handling of numeric types and bounds checking.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include choosing appropriate data types and avoiding implicit conversions.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly address avoiding unsafe casts from unsigned to signed integers.

none

Capacity management monitors overall resource use but does not prevent individual allocation bugs.

References