CVE-2026-14687
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2026-14687 is a medium-severity Partial String Comparison (CWE-187) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 5.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and AC-25 (Reference Monitor) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-41709
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was determined in 666ghj BettaFish up to 1.2.1. Impacted is the function _deduplicate_results of the file InsightEngine/agent.py of the component InsightEngine search-result Deduplication. Executing a manipulation can lead to partial string comparison. The attack can be launched remotely.…
more
The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V10.4.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover incomplete string comparisons through targeted test cases.
A reference monitor must be small and correct, structurally limiting the chance of flawed comparison logic in authorization decisions.
Access enforcement depends on correct authorization checks; partial comparisons would violate the required enforcement of full authorizations.
Security engineering principles include correct and complete comparison logic to avoid flawed decision points.
Input validation requirements force complete rather than partial string comparisons before decisions are made.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect and prevent partial string comparison flaws before deployment.
Secure development lifecycle practices can include requirements to avoid partial string comparisons in authentication or validation logic.
Application security requirements can mandate full, exact comparisons for sensitive operations.
Secure system architecture principles discourage unsafe partial comparisons in critical paths.
Secure coding standards can explicitly prohibit substring-based comparisons for security decisions.
Secure authentication mechanisms can reduce reliance on partial string comparisons for credential or token validation.