Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-15702

Published
14 July 2026
Modified
15 July 2026
CVSS Score v4 2.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0034 27th percentile
Risk Priority 26 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-15702 is a low-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 2.1 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 27th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A security vulnerability has been detected in tamagui up to 2.3.0. This affects the function updateConfig of the file code/core/web/src/config.ts. Such manipulation leads to improperly controlled modification of object prototype attributes. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to…

more

version 2.3.1 is able to mitigate this issue. The name of the patch is e46af9879b7627934ea4d6d6e46e65cea53abb3d. The affected component should be upgraded.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.002 AppleScript Execution
Adversaries may abuse AppleScript for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.005 Visual Basic Execution
Adversaries may abuse Visual Basic (VB) for execution.
T1059.006 Python Execution
Adversaries may abuse Python commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-2964Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2026-15195Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2026-6621Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2026-16151Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2026-55388Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2024-37287Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2026-15187Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2025-5150Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2026-15538Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94
CVE-2026-15698Shared CWE-1321, CWE-94

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V15.3.6
  • V1.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.

Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.

Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.

Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).

PR.DS-10 none match
prevents

PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development catches prototype-pollution flaws before release.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and object-handling controls that directly prevent prototype pollution.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for safeguards against unsafe object attribute manipulation.

prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the likelihood of prototype pollution through safe design patterns.

prevents

Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.

prevents

Change-management processes ensure security fixes for prototype-pollution issues are tracked and deployed.

References