Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-16812

RCE in Arista Velocloud Orchestrator 5.2.0 – 5.2.3.14

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedRCECommand Injection
Published
27 July 2026
Modified
28 July 2026
KEV Added
27 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 10.0
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0088 56th percentile
Risk Priority 75 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-16812 is a critical-severity OS Command Injection (CWE-78) vulnerability in Arista Velocloud Orchestrator. Its CVSS base score is 10.0 (Critical).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 44% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) on-prem contains a flaw that exposes privileged internal functionality to remote access, contrary to its intended design for internal use only. The issue affects the on-premises deployment of the VeloCloud Orchestrator and carries a CVSS score of 10.0 under CWE-78, indicating the potential for an attacker to impact the host system and compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the orchestrator along with managed data.

A remote attacker with no authentication required can exploit the exposure to reach this internal functionality and affect the VCO host. Successful exploitation grants the attacker control that can undermine the orchestrator and the data it manages.

The referenced Arista security advisory notes that hosted and dedicated VCO versions were patched ahead of the public notice, while the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog lists the issue as actively exploited in the wild. The current EPSS score stands at 0.0088 with no indicated material increase from prior values.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) on-prem has a security issue where this issue may allow a remote attacker to access privileged internal functionality and impact the VCO host. Successful exploitation may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the orchestrator and data…

more

managed by the orchestrator. This functionality was intended to be for internal use only and is not intended to be remotely accessible. Hosted and Dedicated versions of VCO have already been patched in advance of this notice going out. This issue was discovered externally and is known to be actively exploited.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
27 July 2026

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-25620Same vendor: Arista
CVE-2026-25621Same vendor: Arista
CVE-2026-25623Same vendor: Arista
CVE-2024-12829Same vendor: Arista
CVE-2026-25622Same vendor: Arista
CVE-2014-6271Same vendor: Aristaboth on KEV
CVE-2014-7169Same vendor: Aristaboth on KEV
CVE-2018-14933Shared CWE-78both on KEV
CVE-2026-25089Shared CWE-78both on KEV
CVE-2018-9276Shared CWE-78both on KEV

Affected Assets

arista
velocloud orchestrator
7.0.0 · 5.2.0 — 5.2.3.14 · 6.1.0 — 6.1.3.4 · 6.4.0 — 6.4.2.4

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V15.2.5

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect command sanitization during development.

Input validation directly neutralizes or rejects special characters that would otherwise alter OS command structure.

Least privilege reduces the permissions available to any process that could be subverted by injected commands.

Least functionality restricts available OS commands and interpreters, limiting the blast radius of injection.

Secure engineering principles require proper neutralization of untrusted input before command construction.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly require secure coding and input handling that blocks command-injection defects, yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors and verification gaps unaddressed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching/maintenance can remediate known command-injection CVEs in dependencies (partial forward) but does nothing to stop developers from introducing improper neutralization in custom code (none reverse).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing and code review target insecure use of operating-system command interfaces, catching command-injection flaws introduced during development.

References