Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-20045

RCE in Cisco Unified Communications Manager 12.5 – 14su5

CISA KEVActive ExploitationEUVD ExploitedRCE
Published
21 January 2026
Modified
13 February 2026
KEV Added
21 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.043 90th percentile
Risk Priority 87 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-20045 is a high-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager. Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 10% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; CISA has added it to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-20045 is a code injection vulnerability (CWE-94) affecting Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service (Unified CM IM&P), Cisco Unity Connection, and Cisco Webex Calling Dedicated Instance. The flaw arises from improper validation of user-supplied input in HTTP requests processed by the web-based management interface, enabling an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).

An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the management interface can exploit the vulnerability by sending a sequence of crafted HTTP requests. Successful exploitation provides initial user-level access to the operating system, allowing subsequent privilege escalation to root privileges. Cisco assigned it a Critical Security Impact Rating due to this escalation potential, despite the CVSS score aligning with High.

The official Cisco Security Advisory details the issue and mitigation steps at https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-voice-rce-mORhqY4b. The vulnerability is also listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog at https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-20045, confirming active exploitation in the wild.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME), Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service (Unified CM IM&P), Cisco Unity Connection, and Cisco Webex Calling Dedicated Instance could…

more

allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device.  This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input in HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a sequence of crafted HTTP requests to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain user-level access to the underlying operating system and then elevate privileges to root.  Note: Cisco has assigned this security advisory a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of Critical rather than High as the score indicates. The reason is that exploitation of this vulnerability could result in an attacker elevating privileges to root.

CWE(s)
KEV Date Added
21 January 2026

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.002 AppleScript Execution
Adversaries may abuse AppleScript for execution.
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
T1059.005 Visual Basic Execution
Adversaries may abuse Visual Basic (VB) for execution.
T1059.006 Python Execution
Adversaries may abuse Python commands and scripts for execution.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-20359Same vendor: Ciscoboth on KEV
CVE-2024-20485Same vendor: Cisco
CVE-2022-22965Same vendor: Ciscoboth on KEV
CVE-2026-1340Shared CWE-94both on KEV
CVE-2013-3906Shared CWE-94both on KEV
CVE-2017-9822Shared CWE-94both on KEV
CVE-2017-7494Shared CWE-94both on KEV
CVE-2023-33246Shared CWE-94both on KEV
CVE-2021-22205Shared CWE-94both on KEV
CVE-2023-6548Shared CWE-94both on KEV

Affected Assets

cisco
unified communications manager
12.5 — 14su5 · 12.5 — 14su5 · 15.0 — 15su3a
cisco
unified communications manager im and presence service
12.5 — 14su5 · 15.0 — 15su3a
cisco
unity connection
12.5 — 14su5 · 15.0 — 15su3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.

Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.

Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.

Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).

PR.DS-10 none match
prevents

PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.

none

Controls that restrict unauthorized or malicious code from being introduced via external networks or removable media limit opportunities for an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code.

References