Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-20450

Mediatek Mt2735 Firmware

Published
04 May 2026
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0029 21th percentile
Risk Priority 49 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-20450 is a medium-severity Reachable Assertion (CWE-617) vulnerability in Mediatek Mt2735 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004); ranked at the 21th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to incorrect error handling. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges…

more

needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01753620; Issue ID: MSV-6100.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-20422Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2026-20405Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2025-20760Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2025-20752Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2023-32841Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2023-32843Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2023-32846Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2023-32842Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2023-32845Same product: Mediatek Mt2735
CVE-2023-32844Same product: Mediatek Mt2735

Affected Assets

mediatek
mt2735 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt2737 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6833 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6835 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6853 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6855 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6858 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6873 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6875 firmware
all versions
mediatek
mt6877 firmware
all versions
+41 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation finds reachable assertions during development.

Security engineering principles discourage use of assertions for handling untrusted input.

Validating untrusted inputs structurally prevents attacker data from reaching and triggering assertions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent unsafe assertions from being coded in reachable paths.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software can detect assertion-triggered crashes as adverse events.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record reachable-assertion flaws before deployment.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect reachable assertions before release, reducing the likelihood of exploitation.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates defensive coding and input validation that prevent reachable assertions from being triggered by untrusted data.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify that assertions must not be reachable from attacker-controlled inputs.

prevents

Secure architecture principles discourage the use of assertions for runtime error handling that an attacker could exploit.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly ban the use of assert() or equivalent statements that can be triggered by external input.

References