Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-2239

Redhat Enterprise Linux 7.0 … 9.0

Public PoC
Published
26 March 2026
Modified
03 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 2.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0049 39th percentile
Risk Priority 27 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-2239 is a low-severity Improper Null Termination (CWE-170) vulnerability in Redhat Enterprise Linux. Its CVSS base score is 2.8 (Low).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 39th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in GIMP. Heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists in the fread_pascal_string function when processing a specially crafted PSD (Photoshop Document) file. This occurs because the buffer allocated for a Pascal string is not properly null-terminated, leading to an out-of-bounds…

more

read when strlen() is subsequently called. Successfully exploiting this vulnerability can cause the application to crash, resulting in an application level Denial of Service.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-4887Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2026-6384Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2026-58380Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2026-66759Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2026-66758Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2026-59089Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2026-2272Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2025-6035Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2026-58384Same product: Gimp Gimp
CVE-2023-44444Same product: Gimp Gimp

Affected Assets

gimp
gimp
3.2.0
redhat
enterprise linux
7.0, 8.0, 9.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect string termination during code review or dynamic analysis.

Requiring documented development standards and tools can enforce safe string-handling practices that produce correct null termination.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce correct string/array termination via coding standards, reviews, and static analysis.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect missing or incorrect null terminators before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and string handling rules that prevent missing null terminators.

prevents

Application security requirements can explicitly call for proper string termination and buffer handling.

degrades

Secure architecture principles include defensive coding practices that address buffer and string termination issues.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require correct null termination of strings and arrays.

References