Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-22612

RCE in Trailofbits Fickling ≤ 0.1.7

Published
10 January 2026
Modified
16 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0027 18th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-22612 is a high-severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) vulnerability in Trailofbits Fickling. Its CVSS base score is 8.9 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

Fickling, a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer, is affected by CVE-2026-22612 prior to version 0.1.7. The vulnerability stems from "builtins" blindness, enabling a detection bypass (CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data). It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity with local attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction needed.

An unprivileged local attacker can exploit this vulnerability by crafting a pickle file that evades Fickling's static analysis due to its failure to properly handle "builtins." This requires tricking a user into analyzing the malicious input with a vulnerable version of Fickling, potentially leading to high-impact consequences including unauthorized disclosure of information, modification of data, and denial of system resources.

The GitHub security advisory (GHSA-h4rm-mm56-xf63) and release notes confirm the issue was addressed in Fickling version 0.1.7 via a specific commit (9f309ab834797f280cb5143a2f6f987579fa7cdf). Security practitioners should upgrade to version 0.1.7 or later to mitigate the vulnerability.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Fickling is a Python pickling decompiler and static analyzer. Prior to version 0.1.7, Fickling is vulnerable to detection bypass due to "builtins" blindness. This issue has been patched in version 0.1.7.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-22607Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2026-22606Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2026-14534Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2026-22609Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2026-22608Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2025-67747Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2025-67748Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2026-14535Same product: Trailofbits Fickling
CVE-2024-3301Shared CWE-502
CVE-2025-43713Shared CWE-502

Affected Assets

trailofbits
fickling
≤ 0.1.7

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can uncover deserialization flaws before deployment.

Input validation directly stops deserialization of untrusted data by ensuring inputs are valid before processing.

Engineering principles such as safe deserialization and input sanitization structurally prevent the weakness from being introduced.

Integrity verification tools can detect malformed or tampered serialized data after the fact.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-02 none match
prevents

PR.PS-02 addresses only post-deployment updates/patching and cannot prevent introduction of unsafe deserialization code, yet it can remediate some instances when the flaw exists in outdated libraries or components.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing includes validation of deserialization routines and the use of untrusted data, reducing the likelihood that unsafe object reconstruction will be deployed.

prevents

Requiring vetted libraries, regular updates and SAST before release reduces the likelihood that deserialization logic will accept and act on attacker-controlled serialized objects.

finds

Regular scanning of third-party libraries and timely patching reduce the likelihood that unsafe deserialization vulnerabilities remain active.

none

Mandatory malware scanning of data received over networks or storage media intercepts malicious serialized payloads before they are deserialized by the target application.

References