Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-22888

Cybozu Garoon 5.0.0 – 6.0.3

Published
02 February 2026
Modified
19 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 6.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0040 33th percentile
Risk Priority 27 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-22888 is a medium-severity Improper Handling of Extra Values (CWE-231) vulnerability in Cybozu Garoon. Its CVSS base score is 6.9 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 33th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-22888 is an improper input verification vulnerability affecting Cybozu Garoon versions 5.0.0 through 6.0.3. The issue, classified under CWE-231, allows unauthorized alteration of portal settings, which can potentially block user access to the product. It has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), indicating high severity primarily due to its impact on availability.

A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation enables the attacker to modify portal settings, leading to denial of service by blocking access to Garoon for legitimate users.

Mitigation details are provided in advisories from JVN (https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN35265756/) and Cybozu Knowledge Base (https://kb.cybozu.support/article/39083/), published around the CVE disclosure on 2026-02-02. Security practitioners should consult these for patch information and workarounds applicable to affected Garoon installations.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper input verification issue exists in Cybozu Garoon 5.0.0 to 6.0.3, which may lead to unauthorized alteration of portal settings, potentially blocking access to the product.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-31397Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2023-27304Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2024-31403Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2024-31402Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2023-27384Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2026-22881Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2024-39457Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2024-31401Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2026-20711Same product: Cybozu Garoon
CVE-2024-31398Same product: Cybozu Garoon

Affected Assets

cybozu
garoon
5.0.0 — 6.0.3

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly enforces correct handling of the number and format of supplied values, stopping extra values from being accepted or processed.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require robust input validation that prevents improper handling of extra values.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect extra-value handling issues but does not prevent them by itself.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes input validation and parameter handling that can prevent extra-value processing flaws.

prevents

Application security requirements typically mandate strict input validation and parameter count checks.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage robust input handling but do not specifically address extra-value scenarios.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require validation of the exact number and type of input parameters.

References