Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HSummary
CVE-2026-24157 is a high-severity Deserialization of Untrusted Data (CWE-502) vulnerability in Nvidia Nemo. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 48th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2026-24157 is a vulnerability in the NVIDIA NeMo Framework, specifically within its checkpoint loading mechanism, that could allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution. A successful exploit might result in code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering. The vulnerability is rated with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and is associated with CWE-502 (Deserialization of Untrusted Data). It was published on 2026-03-24.
The attack requires local access to the system (AV:L), low attack complexity (AC:L), and low privileges (PR:L), with no user interaction needed (UI:N). An attacker with these conditions could exploit the flaw to gain high-impact confidentiality, integrity, and availability effects (C:H/I:H/A:H) within the unchanged security scope (S:U), potentially leading to the described outcomes such as code execution and privilege escalation.
Advisories from the National Vulnerability Database (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24157), NVIDIA (https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5800), and CVE.org (https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-24157) provide further details on mitigations and patches for this vulnerability in the NVIDIA NeMo Framework.
As part of NVIDIA's toolkit for building generative AI models, the NeMo Framework's exposure highlights risks in AI/ML workflows involving checkpoint loading, though no real-world exploitation has been reported in the available information.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2026-15011
Vulnerability Data
NVIDIA NeMo Framework contains a vulnerability in checkpoint loading where an attacker could cause remote code execution. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, information disclosure and data tampering.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can uncover deserialization flaws before deployment.
Input validation directly stops deserialization of untrusted data by ensuring inputs are valid before processing.
Engineering principles such as safe deserialization and input sanitization structurally prevent the weakness from being introduced.
Integrity verification tools can detect malformed or tampered serialized data after the fact.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-02 addresses only post-deployment updates/patching and cannot prevent introduction of unsafe deserialization code, yet it can remediate some instances when the flaw exists in outdated libraries or components.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing includes validation of deserialization routines and the use of untrusted data, reducing the likelihood that unsafe object reconstruction will be deployed.
Requiring vetted libraries, regular updates and SAST before release reduces the likelihood that deserialization logic will accept and act on attacker-controlled serialized objects.
Regular scanning of third-party libraries and timely patching reduce the likelihood that unsafe deserialization vulnerabilities remain active.
Mandatory malware scanning of data received over networks or storage media intercepts malicious serialized payloads before they are deserialized by the target application.