Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-25795

Memory Safety in Imagemagick ≤ 6.9.13-40

Published
24 February 2026
Modified
24 February 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score 0.0038 30th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2026-25795 is a medium-severity NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476) vulnerability in Imagemagick Imagemagick. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-25795 is a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in ImageMagick, a free and open-source software suite for editing and manipulating digital images. The issue resides in the `ReadSFWImage()` function within `coders/sfw.c`, where temporary file creation failure leads to the premature destruction of the `read_info` structure before its `filename` member is accessed, resulting in a crash. This affects ImageMagick versions prior to 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40, with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L) and is classified under CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference).

The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by unauthenticated attackers with network access, requiring low complexity and no user interaction. Successful exploitation triggers a denial-of-service condition through application crash, impacting availability but without effects on confidentiality or integrity.

ImageMagick versions 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40 include patches addressing the issue. Additional details are available in the GitHub Security Advisory at https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/security/advisories/GHSA-p33r-fqw2-rqmm.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40, in `ReadSFWImage()` (`coders/sfw.c`), when temporary file creation fails, `read_info` is destroyed before its `filename` member is accessed, causing a NULL pointer…

more

dereference and crash. Versions 7.1.2-15 and 6.9.13-40 contain a patch.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
T1489 Service Stop Impact
Adversaries may stop or disable services on a system to render those services unavailable to legitimate users.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-25798Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2026-53463Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2026-26983Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2026-23874Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2026-26283Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2025-53015Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2025-68950Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2026-46557Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2026-25799Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick
CVE-2026-48734Same product: Imagemagick Imagemagick

Affected Assets

imagemagick
imagemagick
≤ 6.9.13-40 · 7.0.0-0 — 7.1.2-15

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including static analysis) directly finds null-dereference bugs before deployment.

Documented development standards and tools can enforce null-safety rules and safe pointer usage.

Engineering principles can mandate defensive coding such as explicit null checks before dereference.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (static analysis, code review, safe coding standards) directly prevent NULL dereference bugs during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect NULL dereference defects before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates defensive coding practices that can prevent NULL dereferences.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify input validation and pointer-safety rules.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage defensive design that avoids unsafe pointer use.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly require NULL-pointer checks and safe dereference patterns.

References